Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838271›Full record

ArticleCognitive psychology2020

Decision making in numeracy tasks with spatially continuous scales.

Roger Ratcliff, Gail McKoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roger RatcliffThe Ohio State University, United States. Electronic address: ratcliff.22@osu.edu.
Gail McKoonThe Ohio State University, United States.

Funding

Toward using comprehensive decision-making models in neuropsychological testingR01AG041176 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKOON, GAIL A, RATCLIFF, ROGER · 2012 to 2021
$3.8M
Theoretical analysis of the effects of aging on memory and reaction timeR01AG017083 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RATCLIFF, ROGER · 1999 to 2010
$2.7M
Decision Making on Continuous Scales in Aging and Alzheimers DiseaseR01AG057841 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKOON, GAIL A, RATCLIFF, ROGER · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Decision Making on Continuous Scales in Aging and Alzheimers DiseaseR56AG057841 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKOON, GAIL A, RATCLIFF, ROGER · 2017 to 2017
$576k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017083NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041176NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057841NIA NIH HHS R56 AG057841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A diffusion model of decision making on continuous response scales is applied to three numeracy tasks. The goal is to explain the distributions of responses on the continuous response scale and the time taken to make decisions. In the model, information from a stimulus is spatially continuously distributed, the response is made by accumulating information to a criterion, which is a 1D line, and the noise in the accumulation process is continuous Gaussian process noise over spatial position. The model is fit to the data from three experiments. In one experiment, a one or two digit number is displayed and the task is to point to its location on a number line ranging from 1 to 100. This task is used extensively in research in education but there has been no model for it that accounts for both decision times and decision choices. In the second task, an array of dots is displayed and the task is to point to the position of the number of dots on an arc ranging from 11 to 90. In a third task, an array of dots is displayed and the task is to speak aloud the number of dots. The model we propose accounts for both accuracy and response time variables, including the full distributions of response times. It also provides estimates of the acuity of decisions (standard deviations in the evidence distributions) and it shows how representations of numeracy information are task-dependent. We discuss how our model relates to research on numeracy and the neuroscience of numeracy, and how it can produce more comprehensive measures of individual differences in numeracy skills in tasks with continuous response scales than have hitherto been available.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDecision MakingFemaleHumansIndividualityMalePsychometricsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeDiffusion modelDistributed representationsGaussian process noiseNumber-line tasksSpatially continuous scale

Identifiers

PMID31838271
PMCPMC6953628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.