ReviewJournal of neuroscience methods2020
Methods to measure, model and manipulate fluid flow in brain.
Review in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in interstitial fluid dynamics for diagnostic, targeted drug delivery and precision medicine applications.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- The glymphatic system and glioblastoma.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Microphysiological modeling of the Blood-CSF barrier for biopharmaceutical transport and sequestration: evaluation of PEG-induced accumulation and vacuolation in the choroid plexus epithelium.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Interstitial-fluid shear stresses induced by vertically oscillating head motion lower blood pressure in hypertensive rats and humans.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Micromotion Derived Fluid Shear Stress Mediates Peri-Electrode Gliosis through Mechanosensitive Ion Channels.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Multi-scale multi-physics model of brain interstitial water flux by transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Review
- Effect of cilia-induced surface velocity on cerebrospinal fluid exchange in the lateral ventricles.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Relationship between Parasagittal Perivenous Cysts and Leakage of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents into the Subarachnoid Space around the Cortical Veins after Intravenous Administration.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2021Article
- Progress in mimicking brain microenvironments to understand and treat neurological disorders.APL bioengineering · 2021Article
- Intracranial Distribution of Intravenously Administered Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent over a Period of 24 Hours: Evaluation with 3D-real IR Imaging and MR Fingerprinting.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2021Article
- Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- The Cranial Bowl in the New Millennium and Sutherland's Legacy for Osteopathic Medicine: Part 1.Cureus · 2020Review
- CNS fluid and solute movement: physiology, modelling and imaging.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2020Article
- The Interstitial System of the Brain in Health and Disease.Aging and disease · 2020Review
- Current progress and challenges in the development of brain tissue models: How to grow up the changeable brain in vitro?Journal of tissue engineeringReview
- Comprehensive and stratified meta-analysis of diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space in Alzheimer's disease: Linking glymphatic dysfunction with cognitive decline and amyloid pathology.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The brain consists of a complex network of cells and matrix that is cushioned and nourished by multiple types of fluids: cerebrospinal fluid, blood, and interstitial fluid. The movement of these fluids through the tissues has recently gained more attention due to implications in Alzheimer's Disease and glioblastoma. Therefore, methods to study these fluid flows are necessary and timely for the current study of neuroscience. Imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging have been used clinically and pre-clinically to image flows in healthy and diseased brains. These measurements have been used to both parameterize and validate models of fluid flow both computational and in vitro. Both of these models can elucidate the changes to fluid flow that occur during disease and can assist in linking the compartments of fluid flow with one another, a difficult challenge experimentally. In vitro models, though in limited use with fluid flow, allow the examination of cellular responses to physiological flow. To determine causation, in vivo methods have been developed to manipulate flow, including both physical and pharmacological manipulations, at each point of fluid movement of origination resulting in exciting findings in the preclinical setting. With new targets, such as the brain-draining lymphatics and glymphatic system, fluid flow and tissue drainage within the brain is an exciting and growing research area. In this review, we discuss the methods that currently exist to examine and test hypotheses related to fluid flow in the brain as we attempt to determine its impact on neural function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.