ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2020
A Gaussian-based model for early detection of mild cognitive impairment using multimodal neuroimaging.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved deep canonical correlation fusion approach for detection of early mild cognitive impairment.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Combinations of multimodal neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive test scores to identify patients with cognitive impairment.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Spectral analysis and Bi-LSTM deep network-based approach in detection of mild cognitive impairment from electroencephalography signals.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Broad learning for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using FDG-PET of the brain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Multimodal attention-based deep learning for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Dynamic ensemble prediction of cognitive performance in spaceflight.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Personalised treatment for cognitive impairment in dementia: development and validation of an artificial intelligence model.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- BMNet: A New Region-Based Metric Learning Method for Early Alzheimer's Disease Identification With FDG-PET Images.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Information Flow Pattern in Early Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Neuroimaging Markers for Studying Gulf-War Illness: Single-Subject Level Analytical Method Based on Machine Learning.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Gaussian discriminative component analysis for early detection of Alzheimer's disease: A supervised dimensionality reduction algorithm.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020Article
- Spatiotemporal feature extraction and classification of Alzheimer's disease using deep learning 3D-CNN for fMRI data.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2020Article
- Identifying Early Mild Cognitive Impairment by Multi-Modality MRI-Based Deep Learning.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosis of early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI) as a prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with its delineation from the cognitively normal (CN) group remains a challenging but essential step for the planning of early treatment. Although several studies have focused on the MCI diagnosis, this study introduces the early stage of MCI to assess more thoroughly the earliest signs of disease manifestation and progression. NEW
methodWe used random forest feature selection model with a Gaussian-based algorithm to perform method evaluation. This integrated method serves to define multivariate normal distributions in order to classify different stages of AD, with the focus placed on detecting EMCI subjects in the most challenging classification of CN vs. EMCI.
resultsUsing 896 participants classified into the four categories of CN, EMCI, late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI) and AD, the results show that the EMCI group can be delineated from the CN group with a relatively high accuracy of 78.8% and sensitivity of 81.3%. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): The feature selection model and classifier are compared with some other prominent algorithms. Although higher accuracy has been achieved using the Gaussian process (GP) model (78.8%) over the SVM classifier (75.6%) for CN vs. EMCI classification, with 0.05 being the cutoff for significance, and based on student's t-test, it was determined that the differences for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity between the GP method and support vector machine (SVM) are not statistically significant.
conclusionAddressing the challenging classification of CN vs. EMCI provides useful information to help clinicians and researchers determine essential measures that can help in the early detection of AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.