Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838122›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Motivational interviewing to promote long-acting reversible contraception among Rwandan couples wishing to prevent or delay pregnancy.

Jeannine Mukamuyango, Rosine Ingabire, Rachel Parker, Julien Nyombayire, Sarah Rae Easter, Kristin M Wall, Amanda Tichacek, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Nadine Kaslow, Susan Allen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeannine MukamuyangoProjet San Francisco, Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda; School of Medicine and Health Sciences and School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Rosine IngabireProjet San Francisco, Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Rachel ParkerRwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Julien NyombayireProjet San Francisco, Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Sarah Rae EasterDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Kristin M WallDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Amanda TichacekRwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Laetitia NyirazinyoyeSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences and School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Nadine KaslowDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Susan AllenRwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: sallen5@emory.edu.
Etienne KaritaProjet San Francisco, Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Emory University · USUniversity of Rwanda · RWBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Virologic Correlates of Heterosexual TransmissionR01AI051231 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ALLEN, TODD M, HUNTER, ERIC · 2002 to 2022
$9.9M
EMORY AIDS INTERNATIONAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMD43TW001042 · FIC · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DEL RIO, CARLOS · 1998 to 2013
$6.8M
Couples HIV Counseling &Testing in two African capitalsR01MH066767 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ALLEN, SUSAN A · 2002 to 2006
$6.1M
Family Planning Promotion in HIV Infected ZambiansR01HD040125 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ALLEN, SUSAN A. · 2001 to 2005
$4.2M
Int'l Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies (ITAPS)R25MH064712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LINDAN, CHRISTINA P · 2002 to 2018
$3.4M
VCT with Primary and Concurrent Partners to Prevent HIV Transmission R01MH095503 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ALLEN, SUSAN A · 2011 to 2016
$2.5M
International Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies (ITAPS)R25MH123256 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHRISTINA P LINDAN · 2020 to 2026
$1.8M
Improving allocation of limited HIV prevention and treatment resources in ZambiaK01MH107320 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WALL, KRISTIN MARIE · 2016 to 2019
$515k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW001042NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051231NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD040125NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH107320NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066767NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095503NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH064712NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH123256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew family-planning programs in Africa base demand creation and service delivery on theoretical models. Motivational interviewing is a counseling modality that facilitates reflection on the benefits and disadvantages of a health outcome to encourage behavior change.

objectivesWe evaluate a couples-focused joint family-planning and HIV counseling intervention using motivational interviewing to enhance uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (Paragard copper intrauterine device or Jadelle hormonal implant) among Rwandan couples. STUDY

designIn this experimental study, couples receiving care at 8 government health clinics in Kigali, the capital city, were referred from a parent study of couples who did not want more children or wanted to wait at least 2 years for their next pregnancy. Long-acting reversible contraception methods were offered on site following joint HIV testing and family-planning counseling. At the first follow-up visit 1 month after enrollment in the parent study, couples who had not yet chosen a long-acting reversible contraception method were interviewed separately using motivational interviewing and then brought together and again offered long-acting reversible contraception.

resultsFollowing motivational interviewing, 78 of 229 couples (34%) requested a long-acting reversible contraception method (68 implant and 10 intrauterine device). Long-acting reversible contraception uptake after motivational interviewing was associated with the woman being Catholic (vs Protestant/Muslim/other, adjusted odds ratio, 2.87, 95% confidence interval, 1.19-6.96, P = .019) or having an income (vs no income, adjusted odds ratio, 2.54, 95% confidence interval, 1.12-5.73, P = .025); the couple having previously discussed long-acting reversible contraception (adjusted odds ratio, 8.38, 95% confidence interval, 2.54-27.59, P = .0005); either partner believing that unplanned pregnancy was likely with their current method (adjusted odds ratio, 6.67, 95% confidence interval, 2.77-16.11, P < .0001); or that they might forget to take or make an appointment for their current method (adjusted odds ratio, 4.04, 95% confidence interval, 1.32-12.34, P = .014). Neither partner mentioning that condoms also prevent HIV/sexually transmitted infection was associated with long-acting reversible contraception uptake (adjusted odds ratio, 2.86, 95% confidence interval, 1.17-7.03, P = .022), as was the woman citing long-term duration of action of the implant as an advantage (adjusted odds ratio, 5.41, 95% confidence interval, 1.86-15.76, P = .002). The woman not listing any side effects or disadvantages of implants was associated with long-acting reversible contraception uptake (adjusted odds ratio, 5.42, 95% confidence interval, 2.33-12.59, P < .0001). Clinic location (rural vs urban), couple HIV status, and concerns about negative economic effects of an unplanned pregnancy were significant in bivariate but not multivariate analysis.

conclusionEncouraging couples to reflect on the benefits and disadvantages of long-acting reversible contraception methods, the likelihood of unplanned pregnancy with their current contraception, and the impact of an unplanned pregnancy is an effective motivational interviewing technique in family-planning counseling. One third of couples who did not want a pregnancy for at least 2 years but had not chosen a long-acting reversible contraception method when provided with standard family-planning counseling did so after motivational interviewing. Involving the male partner in family-planning discussions facilitates joint decision making about fertility goals and contraceptive choice. Combining family planning and joint HIV testing for couples allows targeted focus on dual-method use with discordant couples, who are advised to use condoms for HIV/sexually transmitted infection prevention along with a more effective contraceptive for added protection against unplanned pregnancy.

Indexed as

SpousesAdultCatholicismContraceptive Agents, FemaleDrug ImplantsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIncomeIntrauterine Devices, CopperIslamLevonorgestrelLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMaleMotivational InterviewingContraceptive Agents, FemaleDrug ImplantsLevonorgestrelcontraceptive choicecouples’ counselingfamily planning counselingfamily planning in Africalong-acting reversible contraception side effectsmen and family planningobstacles to long-acting reversible contraceptionpreventing unplanned pregnancyreligion and contraception

Identifiers

PMID31838122
PMCPMC7138747
OpenAlexW2995366896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.