Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838035›Full record

ArticleJACC. Heart failure2020

Comparative Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus ACE/ARB Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Nicholas Y Tan, Lindsey R Sangaralingham, S Jeson Sangaralingham, Xiaoxi Yao, Nilay D Shah, Shannon M Dunlay

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Strategy for an early simultaneous introduction of four-pillars of heart failure therapy: results from a single center experience.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Real-world comparative effectiveness of ARNI versus ACEi/ARB in HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas Y TanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Lindsey R SangaralinghamThe Robert and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Sciences of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
S Jeson SangaralinghamDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Xiaoxi YaoThe Robert and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Sciences of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Health Care Policy and Research in the Department of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nilay D ShahThe Robert and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Sciences of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Health Care Policy and Research in the Department of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Shannon M DunlayDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; The Robert and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Sciences of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: dunlay.shannon@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SDM4Afib)R01HL131535 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MONTORI, VICTOR MANUEL · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
Cardiorenal Fibrosis: Biology and TherapeuticsR01HL132854 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SANGARALINGHAM, SASANTHA JESON · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
End of Life Preferences and Healthcare Resource Use in Heart Failure PatientsK23HL116643 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI DUNLAY, SHANNON MARIE · 2013 to 2017
$739k
Diffusion of Clinical Evidence into Practice: Physician Networks, Delivery Organizations, and MarketsR56HL130496 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KARACA-MANDIC, PINAR · 2016 to 2016
$634k
Understanding Caregiving in Heart Failure and Impact on OutcomesR03HL135225 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI DUNLAY, SHANNON MARIE · 2016 to 2017
$159k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025164AHRQ HHS R01 HS025402AHRQ HHS R03 HS025517AHRQ HHS U19 HS024075FDA HHS U01 FD005938NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL116643NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131535NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132854NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL135225NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL130496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper aims to compare the effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in systolic heart failure (HF).

backgroundSacubitril-valsartan reduced risks of death and hospitalization for HF versus enalapril in ambulatory patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in HF) trial. However, the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan and ACE/ARB in patients treated in routine clinical practice is unclear.

methodsWe identified patients with systolic HF in a U.S. administrative claims database treated with sacubitril-valsartan or ACE/ARB from July 1, 2015, to February 2, 2018. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to balance patients on 29 clinical variables. Cox models were used to compare outcomes between treatment groups.

resultsA total of 7,893 matched pairs were included; mean (SD) follow-up was 6.3 (5.4) months. Sacubitril-valsartan was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81 to 0.91; p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.97; p = 0.027), and all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.91; p < 0.001), but not HF hospitalization (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.19; p = 0.26). A lower risk of the primary outcome with sacubitril-valsartan was observed in white patients (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.90) but not black patients (21% of population, HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.15; interaction p = 0.032). No statistically significant differences in treatment response by sex or age were observed.

conclusionsSacubitril-valsartan was associated with lower risks of death and hospitalization compared with ACE/ARB in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with systolic HF. However, our finding that outcomes with sacubitril-valsartan and ACE/ARBs were similar in black patients warrants further evaluation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAminobutyratesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeAminobutyratesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug Combinationssacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationTetrazolesValsartanheart failurehospitalizationmedicationmortalitysacubitril-valsartan

Identifiers

PMID31838035
PMCPMC8356205
OpenAlexW2996572975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.