ArticleJACC. Heart failure2020
Comparative Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus ACE/ARB Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Article in JACC. Heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ten years real-world experience with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of sacubitril-valsartan on left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- 2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Guideline
- 2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2020Guideline
- Machine learning versus logistic regression for propensity score estimation: a trial emulation benchmarked against the PARADIGM-HF randomized trial.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Improvements in medical therapy and prognosis for patients with HFrEF following the 2021 ESC HF guidelines.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Versus Logistic Regression for Propensity Score Estimation: A Benchmark Trial Emulation Against the PARADIGM-HF Randomized Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Comparing High- Versus Low-Dose Entresto in Heart Failure Patients: A 2025 Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the 6-Month Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan Compared to ACEI and ARB on LVEF in Heart Failure Patients: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor adherence and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Early sacubitril/valsartan use associated with reduced atrial fibrillation risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by mitral regurgitation: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Short-term outpatient follow-up of vericiguat treatment in patients hospitalized for heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- SGLT-2 inhibitors and mortality among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: linked database study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Strategy for an early simultaneous introduction of four-pillars of heart failure therapy: results from a single center experience.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Observational
- Acute Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan with Initial Initiation in Pediatric Patients in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Sacubitril-Valsartan in Patients Requiring Hemodialysis.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Mortality and Morbidity of Heart Failure Hospitalization in Adult Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Sex Differences in the Effectiveness of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers, and Sacubitril-Valsartan for the Treatment of Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of ARNI versus ACEi/ARB in HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Article
- New-Onset Heart Failure From Viral Myocarditis and Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis paper aims to compare the effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in systolic heart failure (HF).
backgroundSacubitril-valsartan reduced risks of death and hospitalization for HF versus enalapril in ambulatory patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in HF) trial. However, the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan and ACE/ARB in patients treated in routine clinical practice is unclear.
methodsWe identified patients with systolic HF in a U.S. administrative claims database treated with sacubitril-valsartan or ACE/ARB from July 1, 2015, to February 2, 2018. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to balance patients on 29 clinical variables. Cox models were used to compare outcomes between treatment groups.
resultsA total of 7,893 matched pairs were included; mean (SD) follow-up was 6.3 (5.4) months. Sacubitril-valsartan was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81 to 0.91; p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.97; p = 0.027), and all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.91; p < 0.001), but not HF hospitalization (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.19; p = 0.26). A lower risk of the primary outcome with sacubitril-valsartan was observed in white patients (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.90) but not black patients (21% of population, HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.15; interaction p = 0.032). No statistically significant differences in treatment response by sex or age were observed.
conclusionsSacubitril-valsartan was associated with lower risks of death and hospitalization compared with ACE/ARB in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with systolic HF. However, our finding that outcomes with sacubitril-valsartan and ACE/ARBs were similar in black patients warrants further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.