Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31837172›Full record

ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2020

Intercostal nerve block of the anterior cutaneous branches and the sensibility of the female breast.

Ennie Bijkerk, Anouk J M Cornelissen, Micha Sommer, René R W J Van Der Hulst, Arno Lataster, Stefania M H Tuinder

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07062458 (NIPSENSE - A Comparative Study of Nipple and Skin Sensation Preservation After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Conventional, Endoscopic, and Robotic Techniques), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07062458 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

NIPSENSE - A Comparative Study of Nipple and Skin Sensation Preservation After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Conventional, Endoscopic, and Robotic Techniques

TypeobservationalSponsorCandiolo Cancer Institute - IRCCSRan2025 to 2027Enrolled90ConditionsSensation DisorderArmsNipple Sensation Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ennie BijkerkDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1773-7888
Anouk J M CornelissenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Micha SommerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
René R W J Van Der HulstDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Arno LatasterDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Stefania M H TuinderDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBetter sensation in the reconstructed breast improves the quality of life. Sensory nerve coaptation is a valuable addition to autologous breast reconstruction. There are few publications concerning the sensory nerves of the breast and the nipple-areola complex and reports are contradictory, so it is unknown which nerve is best suited as a recipient for coaptation. The current study serves as a proof of concept. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe areas innervated by the anterior cutaneous branches (ACBs) of the intercostal nerves (ICNs) were studied on two separate occasions in two healthy women. First, the ACBs of ICNs 2-5 were individually blocked using ultrasound. Next, the ACBs of all levels were blocked simultaneously. Sensation was measured using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. The numbed areas corresponding to the ICNs were drawn in a raster of 2 × 2 cm.

resultsThe largest area was supplied by the ACB of the 4th ICN, located in the upper (UIQ) and the lower (LIQ) inner quadrants of the breast. The 2nd-largest area was supplied by the ACB of the 3rd ICN. Blockage of ACBs 2-5 affected sensation in the nipple and the areola.

conclusionsBlockage of all levels 2-5 partially affected sensation in the nipple-areola complex, suggesting innervation by a nerve plexus consisting of both ACBs and lateral cutaneous branches (LCBs). ACB4 supplied the largest area of the breast in the UIQ and LIQ and could be best suited for sensory nerve coaptation to optimize sensation in the autologously reconstructed breast.

Indexed as

AdultBreastFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIntercostal NervesMammaplastyNerve BlockSensationbreast cancerbreast reconstructionintercostal nervenipple-areola complexsensation

Identifiers

PMID31837172
PMCPMC7540051
OpenAlexW2996325300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.