Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31836867›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

Solid-state nanopore fabrication by automated controlled breakdown.

Matthew Waugh, Kyle Briggs, Dylan Gunn, Mathieu Gibeault, Simon King, Quinn Ingram, Aura Melissa Jimenez, Samuel Berryman, Dmytro Lomovtsev, Lukasz Andrzejewski and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matthew Waugh *Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kyle Briggs *Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0183-6585
Dylan GunnDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mathieu GibeaultDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Simon KingDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Quinn IngramDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Aura Melissa JimenezDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Samuel BerrymanDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dmytro LomovtsevDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lukasz AndrzejewskiDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Vincent Tabard-CossaDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. tcossa@uottawa.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4375-717X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-state nanopores are now well established as single-biomolecule sensors that hold great promise as sensing elements in diagnostic and sequencing applications. However, until recently this promise has been limited by the expensive, labor-intensive, and low-yield methods used to fabricate low-noise and precisely sized pores. To address this problem, we pioneered a low-cost and scalable solid-state nanopore fabrication method, termed controlled breakdown (CBD), which is rapidly becoming the method of choice for fabricating solid-state nanopores. Since its initial development, nanopore research groups around the world have applied and adapted the CBD method in a variety of ways, with varying levels of success. In this work, we present our accumulated knowledge of nanopore fabrication by CBD, including a detailed description of the instrumentation, software, and procedures required to reliably fabricate low-noise and precisely sized solid-state nanopores with a yield of >85% in less than 1 h. The assembly instructions for the various custom instruments can be found in the Supplementary Manual, and take approximately a day to complete, depending on the unit that the user is building and their level of skill with mechanical and electrical assembly. Unlike traditional beam-based nanopore fabrication technologies, the methods presented here are accessible to non-experts, lowering the cost of, and technical barriers to, fabricating nanoscale pores in thin solid-state membranes.

Indexed as

NanoporesAutomationMembranes, ArtificialNanotechnologyMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.