Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31836838›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2020

How the ageing microenvironment influences tumour progression.

Mitchell Fane, Ashani T Weeraratna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 556 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
556citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

556 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Associations of exposure to PMBMC public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The long-lived immune system of centenarians.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

496 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mitchell FaneThe Wistar Institute, Immunology, Microenvironment and Metastasis Program, Philadelphia, PA, USA. mfane@jhu.edu.
Ashani T WeeraratnaThe Wistar Institute, Immunology, Microenvironment and Metastasis Program, Philadelphia, PA, USA. aweeraratna@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0448-6952

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
Targeting the MAP and PI3 Kinase Pathways in MelanomaP01CA114046 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI MURPHY, MAUREEN E. · 2008 to 2023
$37.1M
An integrated approach to melanoma metastasis and therapy resistance: effects of age-related changes in the ECM and the biomechanics of the skinR01CA232256 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI CUKIERMAN, EDNA, RAJ, ARJUN · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Promotion of tumor invasion and pseudosenescence by the aging microenvironmentR01CA174746 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI WEERARATNA, ASHANI T · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
Effect of the aged microenvironment on tumor dormancyR01CA207935 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI WEERARATNA, ASHANI T · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA114046NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174746NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207935NCI NIH HHS R01 CA232256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cancers arise in individuals over the age of 60. As the world population is living longer and reaching older ages, cancer is becoming a substantial public health problem. It is estimated that, by 2050, more than 20% of the world's population will be over the age of 60 - the economic, healthcare and financial burdens this may place on society are far from trivial. In this Review, we address the role of the ageing microenvironment in the promotion of tumour progression. Specifically, we discuss the cellular and molecular changes in non-cancerous cells during ageing, and how these may contribute towards a tumour permissive microenvironment; these changes encompass biophysical alterations in the extracellular matrix, changes in secreted factors and changes in the immune system. We also discuss the contribution of these changes to responses to cancer therapy as ageing predicts outcomes of therapy, including survival. Yet, in preclinical studies, the contribution of the aged microenvironment to therapy response is largely ignored, with most studies designed in 8-week-old mice rather than older mice that reflect an age appropriate to the disease being modelled. This may explain, in part, the failure of many successful preclinical therapies upon their translation to the clinic. Overall, the intention of this Review is to provide an overview of the interplay that occurs between ageing cell types in the microenvironment and cancer cells and how this is likely to impact tumour metastasis and therapy response.

Indexed as

AgingTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticCombined Modality TherapyDisease ProgressionExtracellular MatrixHumansNeoplasmsStromal CellsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31836838
PMCPMC7377404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.