Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31836805›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Manipulating rod-shaped bacteria with optical tweezers.

Zheng Zhang, Tom E P Kimkes, Matthias Heinemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Stochastic motility energetics reveals cooperative bacterial swarming in optical tweezers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transformation of theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Optical Tweezers Exploring Neuroscience.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zheng ZhangMolecular Systems Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Tom E P KimkesMolecular Systems Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Matthias HeinemannMolecular Systems Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG, Groningen, the Netherlands. m.heinemann@rug.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical tweezers have great potential in microbiology for holding and manipulating single cells under a microscope. However, the methodology to use optical tweezers for live cell studies is still at its infancy. In this work, we determined suitable parameters for stable trapping of single Escherichia coli bacteria, and identified the upper limits of IR-exposure that can be applied without affecting viability. We found that the maximum tolerable IR-exposure is 2.5-fold higher when employing oscillating instead of stationary optical trapping (20 J and 8 J, respectively). We found that good stability of cells in an oscillating trap is achieved when the effective trap length is 20% larger than the cell length, the oscillation frequency higher than 100 Hz and the trap oriented perpendicular to the medium flow direction. Further, we show, using an IR power just sufficient for stable holding, that bacteria remain viable during at least 30 min of holding in an oscillating trap. In this work, we established a method for long-term stable handling of single E. coli cells using optical tweezers. This work will pave the way for future use of optical tweezers in microbiology.

Indexed as

Optical TweezersEscherichia coliFluorescenceLightMicrobial ViabilityMicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID31836805
PMCPMC6911073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.