Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31836795›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Oral Microbiome in Patients with Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Qian Wang, Yuting Rao, Xiaobing Guo, Na Liu, Shuxiu Liu, Peipei Wen, Shuang Li, Yuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The microbiota in eosinophilic esophagitis: A systematic review.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Differences in the Oral Microbiome Between Patients With and Without Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qian WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuting RaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaobing GuoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. gxbing928@zzu.edu.cn.
Na LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuxiu LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Peipei WenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuang LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuan LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the oral microflora of patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), saliva samples were collected from 20 patients with ESCC and 21 healthy controls. The V3-V4 region of 16S rDNA was amplified and sequenced by the Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing platform. The final sequences were used for OTU analysis. Alpha and beta diversity analysis showed that the bacterial diversity and richness of the ESCC group were lower than those of the control group, while the variability of the ESCC group was higher than that of the control group. According to the Metastats difference analysis and LEfSe analysis, the high risk of ESCC may be related to Actinomyces and Atopobium, while the healthy control group is closely related to Fusobacterium and Porphyromonas (the analysis was performed at the genus level). The establishment of the relationship between oral microbiota and risk of ESCC may lead to significant advances in understanding the aetiology of cancer and may open a new research paradigm for cancer prevention.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAgedBacteriaBiodiversityDiscriminant AnalysisEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleMouthPhylogenyPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31836795
PMCPMC6910992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.