Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31836661›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Taste Quality Representation in the Human Brain.

Jason A Avery, Alexander G Liu, John E Ingeholm, Cameron D Riddell, Stephen J Gotts, Alex Martin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Domain-General Neural Effects of Associative Learning and Expectations on Pain and Hedonic Taste Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perceptual Dysfunction in Eating Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason A AveryLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 jason.avery@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-4097-2819
Alexander G LiuLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
John E IngeholmLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-5117
Cameron D RiddellLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Stephen J GottsLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Alex MartinLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-3636-2498
National Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

The Neural Foundations for Memory and Social Cognition In The Human BrainZIAMH002588 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MARTIN, ALEX · 2009 to 2025
$21.1M
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Autism Spectrum DisordersZIAMH002920 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MARTIN, ALEX · 2009 to 2025
$14.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the mammalian brain, the insula is the primary cortical substrate involved in the perception of taste. Recent imaging studies in rodents have identified a "gustotopic" organization in the insula, whereby distinct insula regions are selectively responsive to one of the five basic tastes. However, numerous studies in monkeys have reported that gustatory cortical neurons are broadly-tuned to multiple tastes, and tastes are not represented in discrete spatial locations. Neuroimaging studies in humans have thus far been unable to discern between these two models, though this may be because of the relatively low spatial resolution used in taste studies to date. In the present study, we examined the spatial representation of taste within the human brain using ultra-high resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at high magnetic field strength (7-tesla). During scanning, male and female participants tasted sweet, salty, sour, and tasteless liquids, delivered via a custom-built MRI-compatible tastant-delivery system. Our univariate analyses revealed that all tastes (vs tasteless) activated primary taste cortex within the bilateral dorsal mid-insula, but no brain region exhibited a consistent preference for any individual taste. However, our multivariate searchlight analyses were able to reliably decode the identity of distinct tastes within those mid-insula regions, as well as brain regions involved in affect and reward, such as the striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala. These results suggest that taste quality is not represented topographically, but by a distributed population code, both within primary taste cortex as well as regions involved in processing the hedonic and aversive properties of taste.

Indexed as

AdultAmygdalaBrainBrain MappingCerebral CortexCorpus StriatumFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexTasteTaste PerceptionYoung Adult7TfMRIMVPAtaste

Identifiers

PMID31836661
PMCPMC6989007
OpenAlexW2995612428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.