Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31836331›Full record

ReviewInfectious disease clinics of North America2020

Collaborative Antimicrobial Stewardship: Working with Microbiology.

Elizabeth L Palavecino, John C Williamson, Christopher A Ohl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious disease clinics of North America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Impact of Positive Culture Reports ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  10. Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Clinical impact of aJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth L PalavecinoDepartment of Pathology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
John C WilliamsonDepartment of Pharmacy, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Infectious Diseases, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Christopher A OhlDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Infectious Diseases, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Electronic address: cohl@wakehealth.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been tremendous advances in methodologies available for detection and identification of organisms causing infections. Providers can now obtain identification results and antimicrobial susceptibility results in a shorter period of time. However, declining health care resources highlight the importance of selecting the right test at the right time to maximize diagnostic benefits. Therefore, the role of the antimicrobial stewardship team in the clinical microbiology laboratory has expanded to include diagnostic stewardship and provision of guidance on test selection for diagnosis and management of infection. This review focuses on the experience of our group in collaborative stewardship, emphasizing successes and challenges.

Indexed as

Intersectoral CollaborationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipClinical Laboratory TechniquesCommunicable DiseasesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPhysiciansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiogramAntimicrobial stewardshipClostridium difficileInfectious diseases diagnosisMolecular panelsRapid testingRole of microbiology laboratory

Identifiers

PMID31836331
PMCPMC7127374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.