ReviewSeminars in hematology2019
Red Cell Transfusions in the Genomics Era.
Review in Seminars in hematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical integration of red cell genotyping in children with β-thalassemia major: a prospective observational study.Blood global hematology · 2026Article
- The Immunology of Transfusion Medicine: Past, Present, and Future.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- DEL in China: the D antigen among serologic RhD-negative individuals.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Red cell genotyping has become widely available and now contributes to support transfusion of patients with hematologic diseases. This technology has facilitated the immunohematologic approach to antibody prevention, detection and identification. Donors, particularly rare donors, are most efficiently screened and identified by red cell genotyping. In transfused patients with challenging serologic reactivity, antibodies are more reliably identified when molecular typing information is available. Red cell genotyping of both donors and patients augments the selection of blood components. This technology, serving at the core of a real-time database inventory, is resulting in blood supply efficiencies. However, there is limited published evidence on the extent to which red cell genotyping has translated into improved clinical outcomes. Red cell alloimmunized patients may benefit the most in enhanced safety. For patients with antibodies to high-prevalence antigens, other than Rh, blood centers realized supply-chain efficiencies in the past decade. Prospective clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies would contribute to further clarifying the optimal role of molecular testing in providing transfusion support for patients with hematologic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.