Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31836024›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2019

Water supply, sanitation and hygiene interventions and childhood diarrhea in Kersa and Omo Nada districts of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Negasa Eshete Soboksa, Abebe Beyene Hailu, Sirak Robele Gari, Bezatu Mengistie Alemu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Negasa Eshete SoboksaEthiopian Institute of Water Resources, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. yeroosaa@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3451-175X
Abebe Beyene HailuDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Sirak Robele GariEthiopian Institute of Water Resources, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bezatu Mengistie AlemuCollege of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Ethiopian Civil Service University · ETHaramaya University · ETJimma University · ETWater and Land Resource Centre · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiarrhea is a major public health problem that disproportionately affects children in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Most of the diseases can be prevented through safe drinking water supply and provision of basic sanitation and hygiene. However, there is a paucity of information on childhood diarrhea related to interventions in kebeles (smallest administrative structure) where community-led total sanitation (CLTS) implemented and not implemented (non-CLTS). Thus, the aim of this study was to assess and compare the association of water supply, sanitation and hygiene interventions, and childhood diarrhea in CLTS implemented and non-implemented kebeles.

methodA comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in Kersa and Omo Nada districts of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia from July 22 to August 9, 2018. Systematically selected 756 households with under-5 children were included in the study. Data were collected through interview using structured questionnaires. Water samples were collected in nonreactive borosilicate glass bottles. The binary logistic regression model was used; variables with a p value < 0.05 were considered as significantly associated with childhood diarrhea.

resultsThe prevalence of childhood diarrhea in the past 2 weeks was 17.7% (95% CI: 13.9-21.5) in CLTS kebeles and 22.0% (95% CI: 17.8-26.2) in non-CLTS kebeles. The occurrence of childhood diarrhea, increased among children whose families did not treat drinking water at home compared to those who treated in both CLTS (AOR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.02-05.98) and non-CLTS (AOR = 1.98; 95% CI: 0.82-4.78) kebeles. About 96% of households in CLTS and 91% of households in non-CLTS kebeles had pit latrine with and without superstructure. Children from families that used water and soap to wash their hands were 76% less likely to have diarrhea in CLTS kebeles (AOR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.31-1.88) and 54% less likely to have diarrhea in non-CLTS kebeles (AOR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.17-1.72) when compared to children from families who used only water. The odds of having diarrhea was 1.63 times higher among children whose families live in CLTS non-implemented kebeles compared to those children whose families live in CLTS implemented kebeles (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.98-2.68).

conclusionsNo significant difference was observed in the prevalence of childhood diarrhea between CLTS and non-CLTS kebeles.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsHygieneChild, PreschoolCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesDiarrheaEthiopiaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsSanitationSurveys and QuestionnairesToilet FacilitiesChildhood diarrheaCLTS kebelesHygieneInterventionSanitationWater supply

Identifiers

PMID31836024
PMCPMC6911286
OpenAlexW2995775691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.