Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31835458›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Nanomaterials as Alternative Control Means Against Postharvest Diseases in Fruit Crops.

Sergio Ruffo Roberto, Khamis Youssef, Ayat Farghily Hashim, Antonio Ippolito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aflatoxins in Peanut (ACS omega · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Comprehensive Review of Fungi on Coffee.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Engineered Nanomaterials Suppress the Soft Rot Disease (Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sergio Ruffo RobertoAgricultural Research Center, Londrina State University, Londrina 86057-970, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2357-187X
Khamis YoussefAgricultural Research Center, Plant Pathology Research Institute, 9 Gamaa St, Giza 12619, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0089-1750
Ayat Farghily HashimFats and Oils Department, National Research Centre, Cairo 12622, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1376-091X
Antonio IppolitoDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0871-7498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-harvest diseases of fruit and vegetables have to be controlled because of the high added value of commodities and the great economic loss related to spoilage. Synthetic fungicides are the first choice worldwide to control post-harvest diseases of fruit and vegetables. However, several problems and constraints related to their use have forced scientists to develop alternatives control means to prevent post-harvest diseases. Physical and biological means, resistance inducers, and GRAS (generally recognized as safe) compounds are the most important alternatives used during the last 20 years. Recently, nanomaterial treatments have demonstrated promising results and they are being investigated to reduce the utilization of synthetic fungicides to control post-harvest rot in fruit and vegetables. The collective information in this review article covers a wide range of nanomaterials used to control post-harvest decays related to each selected fruit crop including grape, citrus, banana, apple, mango, peach, and nectarine. Other examples also used are apricot, guava, avocado, papaya, dragon, pear, longan, loquat, jujubes, and pomegranate fruits.

Indexed as

fruitsnanomaterialsnanotechnologypost-harvest diseases

Identifiers

PMID31835458
PMCPMC6955672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.