Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31835341›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Maternal Decisions on Portion Size and Portion Control Strategies for Snacks in Preschool Children.

Sophie Reale, Colette Marr, Joanne E Cecil, Marion M Hetherington, Samantha J Caton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophie RealeSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2421-7661
Colette MarrSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4663-1345
Joanne E CecilPopulation and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TF, UK.
Marion M HetheringtonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8677-5234
Samantha J CatonSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9096-0800

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M027384/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caregivers are responsible for the type and amount of food young children are served. However, it remains unclear what considerations caregivers make when serving snacks to children. The aim of the study was to explore mothers' decisions and portion control strategies during snack preparation in the home environment. Forty mothers of children aged 24-48 months participated in the study. Mothers prepared five snack foods for themselves and their child whilst verbalizing their actions and thoughts. Mothers were then asked about their portion size decisions in a semi-structured interview. Transcripts were imported into NVivo and analyzed thematically. Three key themes were identified: (1) portion size considerations, (2) portion control methods, and (3) awareness and use of portion size recommendations. Transient, food-related situational influences influenced mothers and disrupted planning and portion control. Food packaging and dishware size were used as visual cues for portion control; however, these vary widely in their size, thus emphasizing mothers' uncertainty regarding appropriate portion sizes. Mothers called for portion size information to be accessible, child-centered, and simple. These findings reveal multiple considerations when deciding on the correct snack portion sizes for children. These decisions are complex and vary across situations and time, and according to the types of snacks offered.

Indexed as

MothersPortion SizeSnacksAdultChild, PreschoolDecision MakingEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalemothersportion sizepreschool childrenqualitativesnacksthink-aloud method

Identifiers

PMID31835341
PMCPMC6950145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.