Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31835317›Full record

ReviewPolymers2019

Application of Protein-Based Films and Coatings for Food Packaging: A Review.

Hongbo Chen, Jingjing Wang, Yaohua Cheng, Chuansheng Wang, Haichao Liu, Huiguang Bian, Yiren Pan, Jingyao Sun, Wenwen Han

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 445 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongbo ChenCollege of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Jingjing WangCollege of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Yaohua ChengCollege of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Chuansheng WangCollege of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Haichao LiuAcademic Division of Engineering, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Huiguang BianCollege of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Yiren PanCollege of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Jingyao SunAcademic Division of Engineering, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0140-0212
Wenwen HanAcademic Division of Engineering, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Qingdao University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities JD1910Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2019BEE056 and ZR2016XJ003Polymer Material Intelligent Manufacturing Innovation Team 2019KJB007the Talents Introduction Project in Beijing University of Chemical Technology buctrc201909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the IV generation of packaging, biopolymers, with the advantages of biodegradability, process ability, combination possibilities and no pollution to food, have become the leading food packaging materials. Biopolymers can be directly extracted from biomass, synthesized from bioderived monomers and produced directly by microorganisms which are all abundant and renewable. The raw materials used to produce biopolymers are low-cost, some even coming from agrion dustrial waste. This review summarized the advances in protein-based films and coatings for food packaging. The materials studied to develop protein-based packaging films and coatings can be divided into two classes: plant proteins and animal proteins. Parts of proteins are referred in this review, including plant proteins i.e., gluten, soy proteins and zein, and animal proteins i.e., casein, whey and gelatin. Films and coatings based on these proteins have excellent gas barrier properties and satisfactory mechanical properties. However, the hydrophilicity of proteins makes the protein-based films present poor water barrier characteristics. The application of plasticizers and the corresponding post-treatments can make the properties of the protein-based films and coatings improved. The addition of active compounds into protein-based films can effectively inhibit or delay the growth of microorganisms and the oxidation of lipids. The review also summarized the research about the storage requirements of various foods that can provide corresponding guidance for the preparation of food packaging materials. Numerous application examples of protein-based films and coatings in food packaging also confirm their important role in food packaging materials.

Indexed as

active protein-based filmsapplications for food-packagingplasticizerspropertiesprotein-based films and coatings

Identifiers

PMID31835317
PMCPMC6960667
OpenAlexW2993832750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.