Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31835288›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019

SegAE: Unsupervised white matter lesion segmentation from brain MRIs using a CNN autoencoder.

Hans E Atlason, Askell Love, Sigurdur Sigurdsson, Vilmundur Gudnason, Lotta M Ellingsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Cerebral small vessel disease lesion segmentation methods: A systematic review.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025
    Review
  4. Evaluating Autoencoders for Dimensionality Reduction of MRI-derived Radiomics and Classification of Malignant Brain Tumors.Scientific and statistical database management : International Conference, SSDBM ... : proceedings. International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hans E AtlasonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Askell LoveDepartment of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; Department of Radiology, Landspitali - University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Sigurdur SigurdssonThe Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland.
Vilmundur GudnasonDepartment of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; The Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland.
Lotta M EllingsenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: lotta@hi.is.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) of presumed vascular origin are frequently observed in magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the elderly. Detection and quantification of WMHs is important to help doctors make diagnoses and evaluate prognosis of their elderly patients, and once quantified, these can act as biomarkers in clinical research studies. Manual delineation of WMHs can be both time-consuming and inconsistent, hence, automatic segmentation methods are often preferred. However, fully automatic methods can be challenging to construct due to the variability in lesion load, placement of lesions, and voxel intensities. Several state-of-the-art lesion segmentation methods based on supervised Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been proposed. These approaches require manually delineated lesions for training the parameters of the network. Here we present a novel approach for WMH segmentation using a CNN trained in an unsupervised manner, by reconstructing multiple MRI sequences as weighted sums of segmentations of WMHs and tissues present in the images. After training, our method can be used to segment new images that are not part of the training set to provide fast and robust segmentation of WMHs in a matter of seconds per subject. Comparisons with state-of-the-art WMH segmentation methods evaluated on ground truth manual labels from two distinct data sets and six different scanners indicate that the proposed method works well at generating accurate WMH segmentations without the need for manual delineations.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerUnsupervised Machine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overDeep LearningFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleWhite MatterAutoencoderBrainCNNDeep learningSegmentationWhite matter hyperintensity

Identifiers

PMID31835288
PMCPMC6861597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.