Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31835273›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Association between antimicrobial drug class for treatment and retreatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and frequency of resistant BRD pathogen isolation from veterinary diagnostic laboratory samples.

Johann F Coetzee, Drew R Magstadt, Pritam K Sidhu, Lendie Follett, Adlai M Schuler, Adam C Krull, Vickie L Cooper, Terry J Engelken, Michael D Kleinhenz, Annette M O'Connor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular detection ofVeterinarni medicina · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Susceptibility ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Transcriptomic Changes andVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johann F CoetzeeDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-3991
Drew R MagstadtDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Pritam K SidhuDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3784-5982
Lendie FollettDepartment of Information Management and Business Analytics, College of Business and Public Administration, Drake University, Des Moines, IA, United States of America.
Adlai M SchulerDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Adam C KrullDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Vickie L CooperDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Terry J EngelkenDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Michael D KleinhenzDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America.
Annette M O'ConnorDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Iowa State University · USKansas State University · USDrake University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although 90% of BRD relapses are reported to receive retreatment with a different class of antimicrobial, studies examining the impact of antimicrobial selection (i.e. bactericidal or bacteriostatic) on retreatment outcomes and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are deficient in the published literature. This survey was conducted to determine the association between antimicrobial class selection for treatment and retreatment of BRD relapses on antimicrobial susceptibility of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni. Pathogens were isolated from samples submitted to the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory from January 2013 to December 2015. A total of 781 isolates with corresponding animal case histories, including treatment protocols, were included in the analysis. Original susceptibility testing of these isolates for ceftiofur, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, oxytetracycline, spectinomycin, tilmicosin, and tulathromycin was performed using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Data were analyzed using a Bayesian approach to evaluate whether retreatment with antimicrobials of different mechanistic classes (bactericidal or bacteriostatic) increased the probability of resistant BRD pathogen isolation in calves. The posterior distribution we calculated suggests that an increased number of treatments is associated with a greater probability of isolates resistant to at least one antimicrobial. Furthermore, the frequency of resistant BRD bacterial isolates was greater with retreatment using antimicrobials of different mechanistic classes than retreatment with the same class. Specifically, treatment protocols using a bacteriostatic drug first followed by retreatment with a bactericidal drug were associated with a higher frequency of resistant BRD pathogen isolation. In particular, first treatment with tulathromycin (bacteriostatic) followed by ceftiofur (bactericidal) was associated with the highest probability of resistant M. haemolytica among all antimicrobial combinations. These observations suggest that consideration should be given to antimicrobial pharmacodynamics when selecting drugs for retreatment of BRD. However, prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance to antimicrobial stewardship programs in livestock production systems.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBovine Respiratory Disease ComplexCattleCephalosporinsDisaccharidesDrug Resistance, MicrobialFluoroquinolonesHeterocyclic CompoundsMacrolidesMannheimia haemolyticaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPasteurellaceaePasteurella multocidaProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsceftiofurCephalosporinsdanofloxacinDisaccharidesFluoroquinolonesHeterocyclic CompoundsMacrolidestilmicosintulathromycinTylosin

Identifiers

PMID31835273
PMCPMC6910856
OpenAlexW2995686890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.