Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31835162›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2020

Structural correlates of commission errors in prospective memory.

Michael K Scullin, B Hunter Ball, Julie M Bugg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael K ScullinBaylor University, United States. Electronic address: michael_scullin@baylor.edu.
B Hunter BallWashington University in St. Louis, United States; University of Texas, Arlington, United States.
Julie M BuggWashington University in St. Louis, United States. Electronic address: jbugg@wustl.edu.

Funding

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FAGAN, ANNE · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
AGING AND DEVELOPMENTT32AG000030 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENISE HEAD, Jeffrey M Zacks · 1985 to 2026
$9.7M
Memory-Based Attentional Control: A Behavioral Biomarker for Preclinical and Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease?R21AG057937 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BUGG, JULIE M · 2018 to 2019
$419k
Using Smartphone Personal Assistant Technology to Improve Prospective Memory in Alzheimer's DiseaseR21AG053161 · NIA · BAYLOR UNIVERSITY · PI SCULLIN, MICHAEL K · 2017 to 2018
$397k
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS R21 AG053161NIA NIH HHS R21 AG057937NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective memory refers to remembering to perform an intended future action, such as remembering to take medication with breakfast. Historically, the field has focused on failures to initially remember a prospective memory task (omission errors), but interestingly, individuals will occasionally repeat a prospective memory action after it has been completed (e.g., double dosing). These failures in prospective memory deactivation/forgetting are termed commission errors. The current registered study investigated structural neuroimaging correlates of a laboratory measure of commission errors in 47 healthy older adults. Extant theories differed in their predicted outcomes: commission error risk was predicted to be highest in individuals with smaller medial temporal lobe volume (output monitoring theory), larger lateral prefrontal cortex volume (residual activation theory), or a combination of larger medial temporal lobe volume and smaller lateral prefrontal cortex volume (dual mechanisms theory). In registered analyses, we found that a higher number of commission errors was associated with larger medial temporal lobe/hippocampal grey matter volume (supporting dual mechanisms theory), but not with grey or white matter volume in the lateral parietal lobe, frontal pole, or a composite of ventrolateral/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (not supporting dual mechanisms theory). In post hoc analyses, smaller volume in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex was associated with a higher number of commission errors, possibly indicating that the dual mechanisms theory of PFC control was conceptually correct, but that a different PFC subregion than anticipated exerts control over commission errors. Collectively, the registered and post hoc analysis findings showed a functional dissociation across MTL/PFC regions that was more consistent with the dual mechanisms theory than the alternative theories.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAgedGray MatterHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexTemporal LobeAgingCommission ErrorHippocampusOrbitofrontal cortexProspective Memory

Identifiers

PMID31835162
PMCPMC7060833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.