ArticlePloS one2019
A validation of machine learning-based risk scores in the prehospital setting.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04757194 (Machine Learning Assisted Differentiation of Low Acuity Patients at Dispatch), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Machine Learning Assisted Differentiation of Low Acuity Patients at Dispatch: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Emergency Medicine Triage - A Systematic Review.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2024Pooled it
- Using machine learning methods to predict all-cause somatic hospitalizations in adults: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning assisted differentiation of low acuity patients at dispatch: The MADLAD randomized controlled trial.PLoS medicine · 2026Trial
- Use of artificial intelligence in the out-of-hospital care settings: a scoping review.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Specialist Physicians in Breast Care Triaging: A Real-World Observational Study.European journal of breast health · 2025Article
- Machine learning to improve predictive performance of prehospital early warning scores.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing a machine learning-based decision support tool for pre-hospital assessment of dyspnoea by emergency medical service clinicians: a retrospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
- Improving Triage Accuracy in Prehospital Emergency Telemedicine: Scoping Review of Machine Learning-Enhanced Approaches.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Article
- A Comparison of the Clinical Characteristics of Short-, Mid-, and Long-Term Mortality in Patients Attended by the Emergency Medical Services: An Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AI-based approach for transcribing and classifying unstructured emergency call data: A methodological proposal.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- AI Algorithm to Predict Acute Coronary Syndrome in Prehospital Cardiac Care: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR cardio · 2023Article
- Clinical Research in Prehospital Care: Current and Future Challenges.Clinics and practice · 2023Review
- On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model for trauma developed using the Swedish Trauma Registry.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prehospital emergency care: A scoping review.iScience · 2023Article
- Development of outcomes for evaluating emergency care triage: a Delphi approach.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Machine Learning-Based Models for Prediction of Critical Illness at Community, Paramedic, and Hospital Stages.Emergency medicine international · 2023Article
- Development of a machine-learning algorithm to predict in-hospital cardiac arrest for emergency department patients using a nationwide database.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- An external validation study of the Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP), an interpretable machine learning-based triage score for the emergency department.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Using machine learning to predict subsequent events after EMS non-conveyance decisions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe triage of patients in prehospital care is a difficult task, and improved risk assessment tools are needed both at the dispatch center and on the ambulance to differentiate between low- and high-risk patients. This study validates a machine learning-based approach to generating risk scores based on hospital outcomes using routinely collected prehospital data.
methodsDispatch, ambulance, and hospital data were collected in one Swedish region from 2016-2017. Dispatch center and ambulance records were used to develop gradient boosting models predicting hospital admission, critical care (defined as admission to an intensive care unit or in-hospital mortality), and two-day mortality. Composite risk scores were generated based on the models and compared to National Early Warning Scores (NEWS) and actual dispatched priorities in a prospectively gathered dataset from 2018.
resultsA total of 38203 patients were included from 2016-2018. Concordance indexes (or areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve) for dispatched priorities ranged from 0.51-0.66, while those for NEWS ranged from 0.66-0.85. Concordance ranged from 0.70-0.79 for risk scores based only on dispatch data, and 0.79-0.89 for risk scores including ambulance data. Dispatch data-based risk scores consistently outperformed dispatched priorities in predicting hospital outcomes, while models including ambulance data also consistently outperformed NEWS. Model performance in the prospective test dataset was similar to that found using cross-validation, and calibration was comparable to that of NEWS.
conclusionsMachine learning-based risk scores outperformed a widely-used rule-based triage algorithm and human prioritization decisions in predicting hospital outcomes. Performance was robust in a prospectively gathered dataset, and scores demonstrated adequate calibration. Future research should explore the robustness of these methods when applied to other settings, establish appropriate outcome measures for use in determining the need for prehospital care, and investigate the clinical impact of interventions based on these methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.