Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31834818›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2020

Impact of Breast Cancer Treatment on Employment: Results of a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (CANTO).

Agnes Dumas, Ines Vaz Luis, Thomas Bovagnet, Mayssam El Mouhebb, Antonio Di Meglio, Sandrine Pinto, Cecile Charles, Sarah Dauchy, Suzette Delaloge, Patrick Arveux and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Targeted self-management limits fatigue for women undergoing radiotherapy for early breast cancer: results from the ACTIVE randomised feasibility trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Association between return-to-work trajectories and depressive symptoms in long-term breast cancer survivors: results from the French CONSTANCES cohort.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Validation of the Brazilian Version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for Women After Breast Cancer Surgery.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Agnes DumasUniversité de Paris, ECEVE UMR 1123, INSERM (National Institute for Health and Medical Research), Paris, France.
Ines Vaz LuisBreast Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Thomas BovagnetSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Mayssam El MouhebbClinical Research Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Antonio Di MeglioINSERM Unit U 981, Villejuif, France.
Sandrine PintoSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Cecile CharlesDepartment of Supportive Care, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Sarah DauchyDepartment of Supportive Care, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Suzette DelalogeBreast Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Patrick ArveuxClinical Research Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Charles CoutantClinical Research Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Paul CottuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Anne LesurInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Florence LereboursDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France.
Olivier TredanCentre Léon Berard, Lyon, France.
Laurence VanlemmensCentre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Christelle LevyCentre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Jerome LemonnierUNICANCER, Paris, France.
Christelle MesleardUNICANCER, Paris, France.
Fabrice AndreBreast Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Gwenn MenvielleSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdverse effects of breast cancer treatment can negatively affect survivors' work ability. Previous reports lacked detailed clinical data or health-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and did not prospectively assess the combined impact of treatment and related sequelae on employment.

methodsWe used a French prospective clinical cohort of patients with stage I-III breast cancer including 1,874 women who were working and ≥ 5 years younger than legal retirement age (≤ 57 years) at breast cancer diagnosis. Our outcome was nonreturn to work (non-RTW) 2 years after diagnosis. Independent variables included treatment characteristics as well as toxicities (Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events [CTCAE] v4) and PROs (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of life Questionnaires, Breast cancer module [QLQ-BR23] and Fatigue module [QLQ-FA12], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) collected 1 year after diagnosis. Logistic regression models assessed correlates of non-RTW, adjusting for age, stage, comorbidities, and socioeconomic covariates.

resultsTwo years after diagnosis, 21% of patients had not returned to work. Odds of non-RTW were significantly increased among patients treated with combinations of chemotherapy and trastuzumab (odds ratio [OR]

conclusionReceipt of systemic therapy combinations including trastuzumab was associated with increased odds of non-RTW. Likelihood of unemployment was also higher among patients who reported severe physical and psychological symptoms. This comprehensive study identifies potentially vulnerable patients and warrants supportive interventional strategies to facilitate their RTW.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEmploymentFemaleFranceHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31834818
PMCPMC7048162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.