Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31834589›Full record

ArticleJournal of abnormal child psychology2020

Application of the Bifactor S - 1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: an Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings.

G Leonard Burns, Christian Geiser, Mateu Servera, Stephen P Becker, Theodore P Beauchaine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. On the Meaning of the "Assessment · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G Leonard BurnsDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA. glburns@wsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5602-7585
Christian GeiserUtah State University, Logan, USA.
Mateu ServeraUniversity of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain.
Stephen P BeckerCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
Theodore P BeauchaineThe Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Funding

A Multi-Method Investigation to Distinguish Sluggish Cognitive Tempo from ADHDK23MH108603 · NIMH · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI BECKER, STEPHEN P · 2015 to 2019
$675k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The symmetrical bifactor model is often applied to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-hyperactive/impulsive (HI), ADHD-inattentive (IN), and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms, but this model frequently yields anomalous or inadmissible results. An alternative model, the bifactor S - 1 model, is more appropriate for examining the hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms. Both models were applied to ADHD-HI, ADHD-IN, and ODD symptom ratings by mothers, fathers, and teachers for 2142 Spanish children (49.49% girls; ages 8-13 years). The symmetrical bifactor model yielded the typical anomalous loadings, with a weakly defined ADHD-HI specific factor and difficult to interpret associations of general and specific factors with correlates. In contrast, the bifactor S - 1 model with ADHD-HI symptoms as general reference factor produced clearly interpretable results. For mothers and fathers, slightly more than 50% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. For teachers, approximately 69% and 39% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms, respectively, represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. The general ADHD-HI reference factor and specific ADHD-IN and ODD residual factors showed convergent and discriminant validity across sources, along with unique associations with peer rejection, social impairment, and academic impairment factors. The bifactor S - 1 model also yielded results consistent with predictions from trait-impulsivity theory of ADHD/ODD development. Researchers should use the bifactor S - 1 model rather than the symmetrical bifactor model if hypotheses involve the latent hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalModels, StatisticalAdolescentAttention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBehavior Rating ScaleChildFathersFemaleHumansMaleMothersPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSchool TeachersAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderBifactor modelBifactor S – 1 modelDisruptive behavior disordersOppositional defiant disorderP factorTrait impulsivity theory

Identifiers

PMID31834589
PMCPMC8017439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.