ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020
Patterns of seizure prophylaxis after oncologic neurosurgery.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Impact of anti-seizure medication duration on postoperative seizures following supratentorial high-grade glioma resection: a mixed-model and tree-based approach.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Antiepileptic Drugs for De Novo Seizure Prevention After Craniotomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Risk factors for thrombocytopenia associated with intravenous valproic acid therapy in pediatric patients undergoing neurosurgical operations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Antiepileptic drugs failed to prevent initial seizures or improve survival outcomes in patients with primary CNS lymphoma.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Predictors for the Occurrence of Seizures in Meningioma.Cancers · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and management of complications from the treatment of primary central nervous system tumors in adults.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical management of seizures in patients with meningiomas: Efficacy of surgical resection for seizure control and patient-tailored postoperative anti-epileptic drug management.Neuro-oncology advances · 2023Article
- Preoperative antiepileptic drug prophylaxis for early postoperative seizures in supratentorial meningioma: a single-center experience.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Review
- An integrated risk model stratifying seizure risk following brain tumor resection among seizure-naive patients without antiepileptic prophylaxis.Neurosurgical focus · 2022Article
- Seizures, Edema, Thrombosis, and Hemorrhages: An Update Review on the Medical Management of Gliomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Review
- Integrating multimodal management and molecular profiling in a patient with BRAF V600E-positive melanoma and brain metastases.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence supporting routine postoperative antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis following oncologic neurosurgery is limited, and actual practice patterns are largely unknown beyond survey data.
objectiveTo describe patterns and predictors of postoperative AED prophylaxis following intracranial tumor surgery.
methodsThe MarketScan Database was used to analyze pharmacy claims data and clinical characteristics in a national sample over a 5-year period.
resultsAmong 5895 patients in the cohort, levetiracetam was the most widely used AED for prophylaxis (78.5%) followed by phenytoin (20.5%). Prophylaxis was common but highly variable for patients who underwent open resection of supratentorial intraparenchymal tumors (62.5%, reference) or meningiomas (61.9%). In multivariate analysis, biopsies were less likely to receive prophylaxis (44.8%, OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.67), and there was near consensus against prophylaxis for infratentorial (9.7%, OR 0.07, CI 0.05-0.09) and transsphenoidal procedures (0.4%, OR 0.003, CI 0.001-0.010). Primary malignancies (52.1%, reference) and secondary metastases (42.2%) were more likely to receive prophylaxis than benign tumors (23.0%, OR 0.63, CI 0.48-0.83), as were patients discharged with home services and patients in the Northeast. There was a large spike in duration of AED use at approximately 30 days.
conclusionsUse of seizure prophylaxis following intracranial biopsies and supratentorial resections is highly variable, consistent with a lack of guidelines or consensus. Current practice patterns do not support a clear standard of care and may be driven in part by geographic variation, availability of post-discharge services, and electronic prescribing defaults rather than evidence. Given uncertainty regarding effectiveness, indications, and appropriate duration of AED prophylaxis, well-powered trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.