Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31834582›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020

Patterns of seizure prophylaxis after oncologic neurosurgery.

Brett E Youngerman, Evan F Joiner, Xianling Wang, Jingyan Yang, Mary R Welch, Guy M McKhann, Jason D Wright, Dawn L Hershman, Alfred I Neugut, Jeffrey N Bruce

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Neuro-oncology practice · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brett E YoungermanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. bey2103@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4792-3190
Evan F JoinerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Xianling WangDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Jingyan YangDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mary R WelchDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Guy M McKhannDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jason D WrightHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Dawn L HershmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Alfred I NeugutDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey N BruceDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence supporting routine postoperative antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis following oncologic neurosurgery is limited, and actual practice patterns are largely unknown beyond survey data.

objectiveTo describe patterns and predictors of postoperative AED prophylaxis following intracranial tumor surgery.

methodsThe MarketScan Database was used to analyze pharmacy claims data and clinical characteristics in a national sample over a 5-year period.

resultsAmong 5895 patients in the cohort, levetiracetam was the most widely used AED for prophylaxis (78.5%) followed by phenytoin (20.5%). Prophylaxis was common but highly variable for patients who underwent open resection of supratentorial intraparenchymal tumors (62.5%, reference) or meningiomas (61.9%). In multivariate analysis, biopsies were less likely to receive prophylaxis (44.8%, OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.67), and there was near consensus against prophylaxis for infratentorial (9.7%, OR 0.07, CI 0.05-0.09) and transsphenoidal procedures (0.4%, OR 0.003, CI 0.001-0.010). Primary malignancies (52.1%, reference) and secondary metastases (42.2%) were more likely to receive prophylaxis than benign tumors (23.0%, OR 0.63, CI 0.48-0.83), as were patients discharged with home services and patients in the Northeast. There was a large spike in duration of AED use at approximately 30 days.

conclusionsUse of seizure prophylaxis following intracranial biopsies and supratentorial resections is highly variable, consistent with a lack of guidelines or consensus. Current practice patterns do not support a clear standard of care and may be driven in part by geographic variation, availability of post-discharge services, and electronic prescribing defaults rather than evidence. Given uncertainty regarding effectiveness, indications, and appropriate duration of AED prophylaxis, well-powered trials are needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnticonvulsantsBrain NeoplasmsCraniotomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLevetiracetamMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPhenytoinPractice Patterns, Physicians'AnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamPhenytoinAntiepileptic drugsBrain tumorGliomaMeningiomaOncologic neurosurgeryPostoperative seizuresSeizure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID31834582
OpenAlexW2994737452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.