Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31834410›Full record

Trial reportScandinavian journal of work, environment & health2020

Effectiveness of adding a workplace intervention to an inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation program: A randomized clinical trial.

Martin Skagseth, Marius S Fimland, Marit B Rise, Roar Johnsen, Petter C Borchgrevink, Lene Aasdahl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02541890 (Effects of Workplace Intervention in Inpatient Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work for Persons With Somatic and/or Common Mental Health Problems. A Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02541890 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Workplace Intervention in Inpatient Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work for Persons With Somatic and/or Common Mental Health Problems. A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2015 to 2018Enrolled175ConditionsMental Disorders, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Fatigue Syndrome, ChronicArmsWork place intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin SkagsethNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Postboks 8905, 7491 Trondheim, Norway. mskagseth@gmail.com.
Marius S Fimland
Marit B Rise
Roar Johnsen
Petter C Borchgrevink
Lene Aasdahl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a workplace intervention (WI) added to an inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation program (I-MORE) on sickness absence. Methods In this researcher-blinded randomized controlled trial with parallel groups, individuals on sick leave due to musculoskeletal, unspecified- or common mental health disorders were randomized to I-MORE (N=87) or I-MORE+WI (N=88). I-MORE lasted 2+1 weeks (with one week at home in between) and consisted of "acceptance and commitment therapy", physical exercise, and work-related problem solving. The additional WI consisted of a preparatory part, a workplace meeting involving the sick-listed worker, the employer, and the primary rehabilitation therapist at the rehabilitation center, and follow-up work related to the meeting. The primary outcomes were number of sickness absence days and time until sustainable return to work (RTW) during 12 months of follow-up, measured by registry data. Results The median number of sickness absence days during the 12-month follow-up for I-MORE was 115 days [interquartile range (IQR) 53-183] versus 130 days (IQR 81-212) for I-MORE+WI. The difference between groups was not statistically significant (P=0.084). The hazard ratio for sustainable RTW was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.48-1.16; P=0.192) in favor of I-MORE. Conclusions This study provided no evidence in favor of I-MORE+WI compared to only I-MORE for long-term sickness absent individuals with musculoskeletal-, common mental- or unspecified disorders.

Indexed as

Occupational Health ServicesWorkplaceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesReturn to WorkSick LeaveSingle-Blind MethodYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31834410
PMCPMC8506308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.