Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31834401›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2020

Impact of national interventions to promote responsible antibiotic use: a systematic review.

Jane Mingjie Lim, Shweta Rajkumar Singh, Minh Cam Duong, Helena Legido-Quigley, Li Yang Hsu, Clarence C Tam

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patterns of antimicrobial use in Qatar's hospitals: Results from the first national point prevalence survey.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jane Mingjie LimSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System (NUHS), Singapore 117549.
Shweta Rajkumar SinghSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System (NUHS), Singapore 117549.
Minh Cam DuongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System (NUHS), Singapore 117549.
Helena Legido-QuigleySaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System (NUHS), Singapore 117549.
Li Yang HsuSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System (NUHS), Singapore 117549.
Clarence C TamSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System (NUHS), Singapore 117549.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal recognition of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as an urgent public health problem has galvanized national and international efforts. Chief among these are interventions to curb the overuse and misuse of antibiotics. However, the impact of these initiatives is not fully understood, making it difficult to assess the expected effectiveness and sustainability of further policy interventions. We conducted a systematic review to summarize existing evidence for the impact of nationally enforced interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use in humans.

methodsWe searched seven databases and examined reference lists of retrieved articles. To be included, articles had to evaluate the impact of national responsible use initiatives. We excluded studies that only described policy implementations.

resultsWe identified 34 articles detailing interventions in 21 high- and upper-middle-income countries. Interventions addressing inappropriate antibiotic access included antibiotic committees, clinical guidelines and prescribing restrictions. There was consistent evidence that these were effective at reducing antibiotic consumption and prescription. Interventions targeting inappropriate antibiotic demand consisted of education campaigns for healthcare professionals and the general public. Evidence for this was mixed, with several studies showing no impact on overall antibiotic consumption.

conclusionsNational-level interventions to reduce inappropriate access to antibiotics can be effective. However, evidence is limited to high- and upper-middle-income countries, and more evidence is needed on the long-term sustained impact of interventions. There should also be a simultaneous push towards standardized outcome measures to enable comparisons of interventions in different settings.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipDrug Resistance, BacterialGlobal HealthHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31834401
PMCPMC6910191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.