Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31834392›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2019

Racial Disparity in Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid and Tau Biomarkers and Associated Cutoffs for Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Stephanie L Garrett, Darius McDaniel, Malik Obideen, Antoine R Trammell, Leslie M Shaw, Felicia C Goldstein, Ihab Hajjar

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of racialization on neuroimaging and plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Considerations in the clinical use of amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Establishing tau-PET cut-points for cognitive diagnosis withImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Large-scale deep proteomic analysis in Alzheimer's disease brain regions across race and ethnicity.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie L GarrettDivision of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Wesley Woods Health Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Darius McDanielDepartment of Neurology, Emory Brain Health Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Malik ObideenDepartment of Neurology, Emory Brain Health Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Antoine R TrammellDivision of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Emory Brain Health Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Leslie M ShawDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Felicia C GoldsteinDepartment of Neurology, Emory Brain Health Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ihab HajjarDepartment of Neurology and Medicine, Emory Clinic at Executive Park, Emory Brain Health Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

In search of an Ethno-culturally Appropriate Strategy for the Early identification of Cognitive Impairment in African Americans, EASE studyR03AG056448 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GARRETT, STEPHANIE LYNN · 2017 to 2018
$305k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG056448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prior evidence suggests that racial differences exist in tau biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD). Whether this reported disparity is associated with a differential level of neurodegeneration and disease stage or with underlying mechanisms separate from amyloid or tau is unclear. Objectives: To compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in African American and white individuals with normal cognition and MCI, to estimate race-based cutoffs for these biomarkers that maximize diagnostic discrimination between normal cognition and MCI, and to study the association of demographic characteristics, cognitive performance, and common vascular risk factors with these differences. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study conducted from March 1, 2016, through January 31, 2019, included participants in the Brain Stress Hypertension and Aging Research Program cohort undergoing baseline assessment. Participants were 50 years or older and recruited from the Atlanta, Georgia, area. Exposures: Self-reported race and cognitive status categorized using modified Petersen criteria and clinical consensus diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Levels of β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42), tau, and phosphorylated tau 181 (pTau181), the ratio of tau or pTau181 to Aβ1-42, and hippocampal volume on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Results: Data from 362 study participants were analyzed (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [7.9] years), of whom 152 (42.0%) were African American, 230 (63.5%) were women, and 189 (52.2%) had MCI. After adjustment for demographic characteristics and cognitive performance, lower mean (SE) levels were observed in African American vs white individuals with MCI for tau (52.40 [5.90] vs 78.98 [5.02] pg/mL; P = .001) and pTau181 (15.42 [2.06] vs 25.24 [1.75] pg/mL; P = .001) and a lower pTau181 to Aβ1-42 ratio (0.07 [0.02] vs 0.14 [0.01]; P = .003). There were no racial differences in the normal cognition group or in hippocampal volumes in the MCI group. Cutoffs for CSF biomarkers were higher for Aβ1-42 in African American relative to white individuals (208 [95% CI, 126-321] vs 197 [95% CI, 183-245] pg/mL) and lower for tau (51 [95% CI, 31-59] vs 59 [95% CI, 56-92] pg/mL) and pTau181 (12 [95% CI, 12-19] vs 20 [95% CI, 12-27] pg/mL) levels. Cutoffs for the pTau181 to Aβ1-42 ratio were 0.05 (95% CI, 0.03-0.12) for African American participants and 0.05 (95% CI, 0.05-0.13) for white participants. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that African American individuals had lower levels of tau-based biomarkers that were not likely explained by the degree of disease stage or neurodegeneration reflected by hippocampal volumes. This study suggests that race is an important factor when interpreting CSF biomarkers, especially in the clinical diagnosis of prodromal AD. It appears that using the pTau181 to Aβ1-42 ratio may ameliorate these differences.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHealth Status DisparitiesWhite PeopleAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCognitive DysfunctionEarly DiagnosisFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleMiddle AgedAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)BiomarkersPeptide Fragmentstau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31834392
PMCPMC6991300
OpenAlexW2996205525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.