Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31834290›Full record

GuidelineMMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports2019

Use of Anthrax Vaccine in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2019.

William A Bower, Jarad Schiffer, Robert L Atmar, Wendy A Keitel, Arthur M Friedlander, Lindy Liu, Yon Yu, David S Stephens, Conrad P Quinn, Katherine Hendricks and 1 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Human anthrax vaccines: Current status and future prospects.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  4. Emerging and Pandemic Pathogens: Lessons Learned From a Clinical Research Network.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RapidAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  8. CDC Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Anthrax, 2023.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Responding to the Threat Posed by Anthrax: Updated Evidence to Improve Preparedness.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Welder's Anthrax: A Review of an Occupational Disease.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Control and Prevention of Anthrax, Texas, USA, 2019.Emerging infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Landscape of Anthrax Prevention and Control: Stakeholders' Perceptive in Odisha, India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

William A Bower
Jarad Schiffer
Robert L Atmar
Wendy A Keitel
Arthur M Friedlander
Lindy Liu
Yon Yu
David S Stephens
Conrad P Quinn
Katherine Hendricks
ACIP Anthrax Vaccine Work Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report updates the 2009 recommendations from the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding use of anthrax vaccine in the United States (Wright JG, Quinn CP, Shadomy S, Messonnier N. Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP)], 2009. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59[No. RR-6]). The report 1) summarizes data on estimated efficacy in humans using a correlates of protection model and safety data published since the last ACIP review, 2) provides updated guidance for use of anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and in conjunction with antimicrobials for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), 3) provides updated guidance regarding PrEP vaccination of emergency and other responders, 4) summarizes the available data on an investigational anthrax vaccine (AV7909), and 5) discusses the use of anthrax antitoxins for PEP. Changes from previous guidance in this report include the following: 1) a booster dose of AVA for PrEP can be given every 3 years instead of annually to persons not at high risk for exposure to Bacillus anthracis who have previously received the initial AVA 3-dose priming and 2-dose booster series and want to maintain protection; 2) during a large-scale emergency response, AVA for PEP can be administered using an intramuscular route if the subcutaneous route of administration poses significant materiel, personnel, or clinical challenges that might delay or preclude vaccination; 3) recommendations on dose-sparing AVA PEP regimens if the anthrax vaccine supply is insufficient to vaccinate all potentially exposed persons; and 4) clarification on the duration of antimicrobial therapy when used in conjunction with vaccine for PEP.These updated recommendations can be used by health care providers and guide emergency preparedness officials and planners who are developing plans to provide anthrax vaccine, including preparations for a wide-area aerosol release of B. anthracis spores. The recommendations also provide guidance on dose-sparing options, if needed, to extend the supply of vaccine to increase the number of persons receiving PEP in a mass casualty event.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAdvisory CommitteesAgedAnthraxAnthrax VaccinesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.ChildEmergency RespondersFemaleHumansImmunization ScheduleMaleMiddle AgedPost-Exposure ProphylaxisPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAnthrax Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31834290
PMCPMC6918956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.