ArticleRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)2020
AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced Macular Pigment Optical Volume Is Linked to High-Risk OCT Biomarkers and Lower Contrast Sensitivity Function in iAMD.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Quantification of Macular OCT Alterations Improves the Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Developing a 10-Layer Retinal Segmentation for MacTel Using Semi-Supervised Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography characteristics of cystic retinal tuft.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Normative Data of Ocular Biometry, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Electrophysiology Conducted for Cynomolgus Macaque Monkeys.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess whether retinal thickness measurements with a standard 30° spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) are comparable with wide-field 55° SD-OCT.
methodsThirty-three healthy individuals were scanned using 55° as well as 30° SD-OCT according to a standardized protocol. Automated retinal layer segmentation of standard and wide-field SD-OCTs was assessed using customized software.
resultsBoth lenses showed a high correlation when analyzing total retinal thickness within the central, the inner, and the outer retinal ring (r = > 0.9). Automated thickness measurements with the 55° system were marginally higher compared with the 30° lens. The thickness of each separate retinal layer using automated segmentation showed excellent correlations within the inner and outer rings (range: r = 0.6-r = 0.9 for the inner ring and range: r = 0.9-r = 1.0 for the outer ring).
conclusionFifty-five degree wide-field SD-OCT provides a good overview of the posterior pole and presents similar quantitative values as a standard 30° OCT lens. Therefore, thickness values are comparable when switching between these two lenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.