Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31833854›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2020

How Teachers Meet in Interdisciplinary Teams: Hangouts, Distribution Centers, and Melting Pots.

Stephanie N E Meeuwissen, Wim H Gijselaers, Ineke H A P Wolfhagen, Mirjam G A Oude Egbrink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Shaping a Culture for Continuous Quality Improvement in Undergraduate Medical Education.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2020
    Article
  4. When I say … team learning.Medical education · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie N E MeeuwissenS.N.E. Meeuwissen is a PhD candidate, School of Health Professions Education, Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-4226.
Wim H GijselaersW.H. Gijselaers is professor of Educational Research and chair, Department of Educational Research and Development, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-2944.
Ineke H A P WolfhagenI.H.A.P. Wolfhagen is associate professor, School of Health Professions Education, Department of Educational Development and Research, and deputy director, Institute for Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Mirjam G A Oude EgbrinkM.G.A. oude Egbrink is professor of Implementation of Educational Innovations, School of Health Professions Education, Department of Physiology, and scientific director, Institute for Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-6598.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore team learning processes among interdisciplinary teacher teams in the development of integrated health professions education and to investigate students' perspectives on the quality of the educational courses.

methodUsing an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods design, the first author conducted 17 vignette-guided, semistructured interviews with teachers originating from diverse disciplines. These teachers worked in different courses of integrated, undergraduate health professions programs at the Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands. The interview guide and vignettes were based on team learning research. The interviews sought to establish how interdisciplinary teacher team members work together on integrated curricula. The vignettes reflected constructs of team learning processes: sharing, co-construction, and constructive conflict. Data were collected between November 2017 and March 2018 and analyzed using template analysis. Sequentially, course evaluation data were used to provide a descriptive analysis of students' perspectives on educational quality (course organization, structure, learning effect, and alignment).

resultsThree team approaches were identified. In fragmented teams or "hangouts," teachers individually worked on tasks that they were interested in, leaving their disciplinary mark. Framework-guided teams or "distribution centers" aimed to work within the given frameworks and organizational expectations, striving for disciplinary balance. Integrated teacher teams or "melting pots" used an interdisciplinary approach on all topics and put students at the center. Integrated teams reflected high-level team learning processes and were most satisfied with their (team)work. In contrast, fragmented and framework-guided teams mainly reflected low-level team learning processes. Students evaluated courses of integrated teacher teams highest on all investigated quality items (course organization, structure, learning effect, and alignment).

conclusionsSuccessful interdisciplinary teacher teams are represented by an integrated approach with high-level team learning behavior and the best course evaluations. Therefore, health professions education management should actively encourage and facilitate integrated teacher teamwork.

Indexed as

CurriculumGroup ProcessesCooperative BehaviorFacultyHealth OccupationsHumansInterdisciplinary PlacementNetherlandsTeaching

Identifiers

PMID31833854
PMCPMC7382530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.