Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31833464›Full record

Trial reportPrimary health care research & development2019

Effectiveness of a primary care-based group educational intervention in the management of patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial.

Iñaki Aguirrezabal, Maria Soledad Pérez de San Román, Raquel Cobos-Campos, Estibalitz Orruño, Arturo Goicoechea, Rafael Martínez de la Eranueva, Mercedes Arroniz, Elena Uzquiza

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Landau model for illustrating the learning and unlearning process of nociplastic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iñaki AguirrezabalSan Martín Health Centre, Integrated Health Organization Araba (Primary Care), Álava, Spain.
Maria Soledad Pérez de San RománAranbizkarra II Health Centre, Integrated Health Organization Araba (Primary Care), Álava, Spain.
Raquel Cobos-CamposMethodology and Statistics Unit, Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Araba University Hospital, Álava, Spain.
Estibalitz OrruñoMethodology and Statistics Unit, Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Araba University Hospital, Álava, Spain.
Arturo GoicoecheaAraba University Hospital (Santiago Headquarters), Integrated Health Organization Araba, Álava, Spain.
Rafael Martínez de la EranuevaMultidisciplinary Teaching Unit of Araba, Integrated Health Organization Araba, Álava, Spain.
Mercedes ArronizSan Martín Health Centre, Integrated Health Organization Araba (Primary Care), Álava, Spain.
Elena UzquizaLabastida Health Centre, Integrated Health Organization Araba (Primary Care), Álava, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Araba · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a primary care-based group educational intervention about concepts of pain neuroscience for the management of migraine compared to the routine medical care delivered to patients with this condition.

backgroundThe way pain is understood has been radically changed in recent decades, thanks to developments in the field of neuroscience. Thus, migraine may develop as a result of an exaggerated perception of threat that activates the pain neuromatrix, which might be modifiable, from a learning perspective, by adjusting the beliefs and behaviours that favour the onset of an attack.

methodsA randomised controlled trial was carried out in five primary care health centres of Vitoria-Gasteiz (Basque Country, Spain). The follow-up period was 12 months. The main outcome measure was the reduction in days lost due to migraine-related disability according to the Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS) score. Secondary outcome measures included the intensity and frequency of the pain and the number of analgesic drugs taken in the previous three months. A positive response to treatment was considered when the MIDAS score decreased by at least 50% from baseline.

findingsDays lost due to migraine-related disability decreased by at least 50% in 68.9% (n = 37) of patients in the intervention group and 34.6% of patients in the control group (n = 18) (P < 0.001). The intensity of the headache [odds ratio (OR) 9.116; P = 0.005] and the medication intake (OR 13.267; P < 0.001) were also significantly reduced with the intervention.

conclusionsThe provision of suitable information through a group educational intervention delivered in primary care appears to be effective in preventing migraine attacks. Moreover, the intervention could offer a new cost-effective management alternative that seems to reduce the need for pharmacological treatment in patients with migraine.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesicsFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPatient Education as TopicPrimary Health CareSpainAnalgesicschronic migraineeducational modelsmigraine disordersmigraine treatmentneuroscienceprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31833464
PMCPMC7003525
OpenAlexW2995409636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.