SynthesisBiological research for nursing2020
A Systematic Review of Taste Differences Among People With Eating Disorders.
Synthesis in Biological research for nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychophysical chemosensory dysfunction in eating disorders: a qualitative systematic review.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2022Pooled it
- Examining eating disorder symptoms and sex as moderators of the association between the sensory attributes and appeal of e-cigarettes.Journal of psychiatric research · 2026Article
- A Study of Nutritional and Sensory Qualities of Pea Protein Isolate Beverages with a View to Their Potential Use in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Perceptual Dysfunction in Eating Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Food Restriction in Anorexia Nervosa in the Light of Modern Learning Theory: A Narrative Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Brain activation in individuals suffering from bulimia nervosa and control subjects during sweet and sour taste stimuli.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Review
- Gastrointestinal Interoception in Eating Disorders: Charting a New Path.Current psychiatry reports · 2022Review
- Altered functional connectivity in adolescent anorexia nervosa is related to age and cortical thickness.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Article
- Oral cavity and eating disorders: An insight to holistic health.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The etiology and maintenance of eating-disorder symptoms are not well understood. Evidence suggests that there may be gustatory alterations in patients with eating disorders.
objectiveThis article systematically reviews research assessing gustatory differences in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED).
methodA systematic review was performed, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, examining taste and eating disorders. We reviewed electronic databases and identified 1,490 peer-reviewed English-language studies. Of these, 49 met inclusion criteria.
resultsStudies employed psychophysical measures ( DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this systematic review is the first to synthesize literature on taste differences in AN, BN, and BED. The inconsistency and variability in methods used across studies increased difficulties in comparing studies and disease processes. Further studies with well-defined population parameters are warranted to better understand how taste varies in patients with eating disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.