Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31833195›Full record

Observational studyMaternal & child nutrition2020

Maternal MUAC and fetal outcome in an Indian tertiary care hospital: A prospective observational study.

Donugama Vasundhara, Rajkumar Hemalatha, Saurabh Sharma, Baru Anantha Ramalaxmi, Varanasi Bhaskar, JagJeevan Babu, Radha Krishna Kankipati Vijaya, RajaSriswan Mamidi

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Maternal & child nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Maternal mid-upper arm circumference to predict small for gestational age: Findings in a Zambian cohort.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. A Cross-sectional Study to Determine the Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women using Mid-upper Arm Circumference and Neck Circumference.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donugama VasundharaNational Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Jamai Osmania, Hyderabad, India.
Rajkumar HemalathaNational Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Jamai Osmania, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3670-7174
Saurabh SharmaNational Institute of Medical statistics (ICMR), New Delhi, India.
Baru Anantha RamalaxmiNational Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Jamai Osmania, Hyderabad, India.
Varanasi BhaskarNational Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Jamai Osmania, Hyderabad, India.
JagJeevan BabuNational Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Jamai Osmania, Hyderabad, India.
Radha Krishna Kankipati VijayaNational Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Jamai Osmania, Hyderabad, India.
RajaSriswan MamidiNational Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Jamai Osmania, Hyderabad, India.
National Institute of Nutrition · INNational Institute of Medical Statistics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies to date demonstrated the relatedness of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measurement of pregnant women to their anthropometry/weight. Hence, the objective was to determine whether maternal MUAC at different gestational age predicted birthweight, and if so, to identify which cut-offs provided the best prediction of low birthweight (LBW) in pregnant women cohort. A total of 928 pregnant women, free of any obstetrical and medical complications known to affect fetal growth, were followed from 20 to 24 weeks' gestation till delivery. Weight, height, and MUAC were determined for the pregnant women, and gestational age along with newborns anthropometry was collected. The mean birthweight was 2.6 ± 0.460 kg. Maternal age, height, weight, MUAC (three time points), gestational age at delivery, and post-natal weight showed positive correlation with birthweight, crown heel length, and head circumference of the neonates. The cut-off limit with the best sensitivity-specificity (54.0 and 59.8, respectively) for MUAC was 23 cm, whereas maternal weight of 55 kg had sensitivity and specificity of 62.5 and 59.9 for predicting LBW. Maternal weight of 55 kg and MUAC value of 23 cm had almost similar sensitivity and specificity for predicting LBW. MUAC (≤23 cm) can be considered as a potential indicator of LBW where weighing of pregnant women is not feasible or when presentation for antenatal care is late, especially where pre-pregnancy weights are not available.

Indexed as

ArmAdultAnthropometryBirth WeightBody Mass IndexBody Weights and MeasuresCohort StudiesFemaleFetal DevelopmentGestational AgeHumansIndiaInfant, Low Birth WeightMaternal AgeMothersPregnancyBirth WeightFetal outcomeGestational weight gainLow birthweightMUACPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31833195
PMCPMC7083480
OpenAlexW2996741072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.