Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31833118›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2020

The importance of the intensive care unit environment in sleep-A study with healthy participants.

Laurens Reinke, Marjolein Haveman, Sandra Horsten, Thomas Falck, Esther M van der Heide, Sander Pastoor, Johannes H van der Hoeven, Anthony R Absalom, Jaap E Tulleken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurens ReinkeDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6697-6095
Marjolein HavemanDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Sandra HorstenDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Thomas FalckPhilips Research, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Esther M van der HeidePhilips Research, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Sander PastoorPhilips Research, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Johannes H van der HoevenDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Anthony R AbsalomDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jaap E TullekenDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep disruption is common among intensive care unit patients, with potentially detrimental consequences. Environmental factors are thought to play a central role in ICU sleep disruption, and so it is unclear why environmental interventions have shown limited improvements in objectively assessed sleep. In critically ill patients, it is difficult to isolate the influence of environmental factors from the varying contributions of non-environmental factors. We thus investigated the effects of the ICU environment on self-reported and objective sleep quality in 10 healthy nurses and doctors with no history of sleep pathology or current or past ICU employment participated. Their sleep at home, in an unfamiliar environment ('Control'), and in an active ICU ('ICU') was evaluated using polysomnography and the Richard-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. Environmental sound, light and temperature exposure were measured continuously. We found that the control and ICU environment were noisier and warmer, but not darker than the home environment. Sleep on the ICU was perceived as qualitatively worse than in the home and control environment, despite relatively modest effects on polysomnography parameters compared with home sleep: mean total sleep times were reduced by 48 min, mean rapid eye movement sleep latency increased by 45 min, and the arousal index increased by 9. Arousability to an awake state by sound was similar. Our results suggest that the ICU environment plays a significant but partial role in objectively assessed ICU sleep impairment in patients, which may explain the limited improvement of objectively assessed sleep after environmental interventions.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPolysomnographyProspective StudiesSelf ReportSleepcritical illnessfirst-night effectpolysomnography

Identifiers

PMID31833118
PMCPMC7154670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.