Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31833048›Full record

ArticleGenes & genomics2020

Performance comparison of dimensionality reduction methods on RNA-Seq data from the GTEx project.

Ho-Sik Seok

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ho-Sik SeokDepartment of Computer and Communications Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, 24341, South Korea. hsseok@kangwon.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-8258-5369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the apparent characteristics of bioinformatics data is the combination of very large number of features and relatively small number of samples. The vast number of features makes intuitive understanding of a target domain difficult. Dimensionality reduction or manifold learning has potential to circumvent this obstacle, but restricted methods have been preferred.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to observe the characteristics of various dimensionality reduction methods-locally linear embedding (LLE), multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), principal component analysis (PCA), spectral embedding (SE), and t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE)-on the RNA-Seq dataset from the genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) project.

resultsThe characteristics of the dimensionality reduction methods are observed on the nine groups of three different tissues in the reduced space with dimensionality of two, three, and four. The visualization results report that each dimensionality reduction method produces a very distinct reduced space. The quantitative results are obtained as the performance of k-means clustering. Clustering in the reduced space from non-linear methods such as LLE, t-SNE and SE achieved better results than in the reduced space produced by linear methods like PCA and MDS.

conclusionsThe experimental results recommend the application of both linear and non-linear dimensionality reduction methods on the target data for grasping the underlying characteristics of the datasets intuitively.

Indexed as

RNA-SeqAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisPrincipal Component AnalysisClusteringDimensionality reductionManifold learningRNA-SeqThe genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) project

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.