Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31833011›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2020

A Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of YLB113 and the Etanercept Reference Product for the Treatment of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Hisashi Yamanaka, Naoyuki Kamatani, Yoshiya Tanaka, Toshihiko Hibino, Edit Drescher, Juan Sánchez-Bursón, Manfred Rettenbacher, Girish Bhatia, Snehal Gadve, Chirag Shah and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hisashi YamanakaInstitute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoyuki KamataniStaGen, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiya TanakaUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Toshihiko HibinoYL Biologics Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Edit DrescherVitál Medical Center, Veszprém, Hungary.
Juan Sánchez-BursónHospital Infanta Luisa, Seville, Spain.
Manfred RettenbacherLupin Atlantis Holdings SA, Zug, Switzerland.
Girish BhatiaMedipoint Hospital Pvt. Ltd, Maharashtra, India.
Snehal GadveLupin Research Park, Lupin Limited, Pune, India.
Chirag ShahLupin Research Park, Lupin Limited, Pune, India.
Dhananjay BakhleLupin Research Park, Lupin Limited, Pune, India. dhananjaybakhle@lupin.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8701-9561

Funding

by Yoshindo Lupin Biologics Ltd There is none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionYLB113 is a biosimilar of the reference product (RP), etanercept, under development for treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other approved indications. A phase 3 study was conducted in Europe, Japan, and India to compare the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of YLB113 with the RP over a treatment period of 52 weeks.

methodsOverall, 528 patients with moderate-to-severe RA receiving concomitant methotrexate were randomized to receive a once-weekly, subcutaneous dose of 50 mg YLB113 or the RP. The primary endpoint was ACR20 response rate at week 24, with similarity confirmed if the 95% confidence interval (CI) for YLB113 and the RP was within the range of - 15 to 15%. Safety and immunogenicity endpoints were assessed to week 52.

resultsBased on the European analysis, in the full analysis set, ACR20 response at week 24 was 83.3% and 88.5% for YLB113 and the RP, respectively. Responses were within the predefined clinical equivalence margin. The sensitivity analysis in the per protocol set revealed a similar proportion of subjects exhibiting ACR20 response at week 24 between groups, with a difference of - 5.1% (95% CI - 11.07 to 0.81). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between groups, and the incidence of antidrug antibody development to week 24 favored YLB113 (0.8 vs. 8.3%).

conclusionsThis study demonstrated biosimilarity of YLB113 to the RP regarding efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in patients with moderate-to-severe RA. Based on the same mechanism of action, biosimilarity could be extrapolated to other therapeutic indications approved for etanercept.

trial registrationEudraCT Number: 2015-002,809-12.

Indexed as

Anti-TNFEtanerceptRheumatoid arthritisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31833011
PMCPMC7021908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.