Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832929›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Using Qualitative Methods to Explore Communication Practices in the Context of Patient Care Rounds on General Care Units.

Milisa Manojlovich, Molly Harrod, Timothy P Hofer, Megan Lafferty, Michaella McBratnie, Sarah L Krein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Expanding Access to Hearing Healthcare for Adults: How Interprofessional Collaboration Can Promote Care Equity From Clinics to Communities.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Role of Gender in Nurse-Resident Interactions: A Mixed-methods Study.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milisa ManojlovichSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. mmanojlo@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-5535
Molly HarrodCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Timothy P HoferCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Megan LaffertySchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michaella McBratnieSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sarah L KreinCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

The Effect of Health Information Technology on Healthcare Provider CommunicationR01HS022305 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MANOJLOVICH, MILISA · 2014 to 2014
$1.6M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022305HSRD VA IK6 HX003399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor communication between physicians and nurses is a significant contributor to adverse events for hospitalized patients. Overcoming communication difficulties requires examining communication practices to better understand some of the factors that affect the nurse-physician communication process.

objectiveTo develop a more detailed understanding of communication practices between nurses and physicians on general care units. We focused on patient care rounds as an important activity in the care delivery process for communication.

designQualitative study design

participantsA total of 163 physicians, registered nurses, and nurse practitioners who worked on pre-specified general care units in each of four hospitals in the Midwest. APPROACH: On each unit, data collection consisted of 2 weeks of observing and shadowing clinicians during rounds and at other times, as well as asking clinicians questions about rounds and communication during interviews and focus groups. A directed content analysis approach was used to code and analyze the data. KEY

resultsWorkflow differences contributed to organizational complexity, affecting rounds and subsequently communication practices, both across and within provider types. Nurse and patient participation during rounds appeared to reduce interruptions and hence cognitive load for physicians and nurses. Physicians adopted certain behaviors within the social context to improve communication, such as socializing and building relationships with the nurses, which contributed to nurse participation in rounds. When rapport was lacking, some nurses felt uncomfortable joining physicians during rounds unless they were explicitly invited.

conclusionsImproving communication requires bringing attention to three contextual dimensions of communication: organizational complexity, cognitive load, and the social context. Initiatives that seek to improve communication may be more successful if they acknowledge the complexity of communication and the context in which it occurs.

Indexed as

PhysiciansTeaching RoundsCommunicationHumansPatient CarePatient Participationcollaborationhospital medicinephysician-nurse relationsteaching rounds

Identifiers

PMID31832929
PMCPMC7080921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.