Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832927›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Factors Influencing Primary Care Providers' Unneeded Lumbar Spine MRI Orders for Acute, Uncomplicated Low-Back Pain: a Qualitative Study.

Andrea L Nevedal, Eleanor T Lewis, Justina Wu, Josephine Jacobs, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Roger Chou, Paul G Barnett

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea L NevedalCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. Andrea.Nevedal@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-3859-8493
Eleanor T LewisCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Justina WuCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Josephine JacobsCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Jeffrey G JarvikDepartments of Radiology, Neurological Surgery, and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Roger ChouDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Informatics and Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Paul G BarnettCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Causes and Consequences of Inappropriate MRI of the Lumbar SpineI01HX002016 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI NEVEDAL, ANDREA L. · 2019 to 2020
–
HSRD VA 1 I01 HX002016-01A1.HSRD VA I01 HX002016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical practice guidelines suggest that magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine (LS-MRI) is unneeded during the first 6 weeks of acute, uncomplicated low-back pain. Unneeded LS-MRIs do not improve patient outcomes, lead to unnecessary surgeries and procedures, and cost the US healthcare system about $300 million dollars per year. However, why primary care providers (PCPs) order unneeded LS-MRI for acute, uncomplicated low-back pain is poorly understood.

objectiveTo characterize and explain the factors contributing to PCPs ordering unneeded LS-MRI for acute, uncomplicated low-back pain.

designQualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

participantsVeterans Affairs PCPs identified from administrative data as having high or low rates of guideline-concordant LS-MRI ordering in 2016. APPROACH: Providers were interviewed about their use of LS-MRI for acute, uncomplicated low-back pain and factors contributing to their decision-making. Directed content analysis of transcripts was conducted to identify and compare environmental-, patient-, and provider-level factors contributing to unneeded LS-MRI. KEY

resultsFifty-five PCPs participated (8.6% response rate). Both low (n = 33) and high (n = 22) guideline-concordant providers reported that LS-MRIs were required for specialty care referrals, but they differed in how other environmental factors (stringency of radiology utilization review, management of patient travel burden, and time constraints) contributed to LS-MRI ordering patterns. Low- and high-guideline-concordant providers reported similar patient factors (beliefs in value of imaging and pressure on providers). However, provider groups differed in how provider-level factors (guideline familiarity and agreement, the extent to which they acquiesced to patients, and belief in the value of LS-MRI) contributed to LS-MRI ordering patterns.

conclusionsResults describe how diverse environmental, patient, and provider factors contribute to unneeded LS-MRI for acute, uncomplicated low-back pain. Prior research using a single intervention to reduce unneeded LS-MRI has been ineffective. Results suggest that multifaceted de-implementation strategies may be required to reduce unneeded LS-MRI.

Indexed as

Acute PainLow Back PainHumansLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrimary Health Carede-implementationlow-back painmagnetic resonance imagingprimary care providersqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID31832927
PMCPMC7174262
OpenAlexW2995760922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.