Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832876›Full record

Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2020

Antibacterial effect of fosfomycin tromethamine on the bacteria inside urinary infection stones.

Fei Song, Chuan Liu, Junyong Zhang, Yusheng Lei, Zili Hu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fei SongDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chuan LiuDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. liuchuan100@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-0261
Junyong ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yusheng LeiDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zili HuDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dalian Medical University · CN

Funding

Chongqing Municipal Education Commission KJ1600239Chongqing Science and Technology Commission csts2016kjhmpt1001-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study sought to evaluate the antibacterial effect of fosfomycin tromethamine (FT) on the bacteria inside urinary infection stones.

methodsThe internal structures of urinary stones were observed via scanning electron microscopy to verify the presence of internal bacteria. We randomly assigned equal numbers of patients with kidney stones who met the inclusion criteria into two groups in a prospective study and treated them with different perioperative antibiotics. One group (experimental group) was treated with FT, and the other (control group) was treated with cefuroxime sodium. All stone specimens were collected via percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The primary infection stones were screened via a stone component analysis, 30 cases in the experimental group and 31 cases in the control group. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-mass spectrometry was used to measure the drug concentration inside the stones, the bacterial count was calculated via stone culture, and the clinical infection index were monitored for between-group comparisons.

resultsCompared with the control group, the experimental group had a higher internal drug concentration, a higher drug sensitivity against various pathogenic bacteria, a lower bacterial colony count in the stone culture, and a lower incidence of postoperative clinical infection.

conclusionsFT is more effective than cefuroxime, which is commonly used during the perioperative period of urinary stones, and exerts a high antibacterial effect on these internal bacteria, and effectively reduces the probability of infection and sepsis after urinary stone surgery. FT can be used as an antibiotic during the perioperative period of urinary stones.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCefuroximeColony Count, MicrobialFemaleFeverFosfomycinHumansKidney CalculiMaleMiddle AgedNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousPostoperative ComplicationsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefuroximeFosfomycinBacteriaCefuroximeFosfomycin tromethamineInfection stonesSepsis

Identifiers

PMID31832876
OpenAlexW2994972383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.