Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832847›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2020

Coupling of CSF and sagittal sinus pressure in adult patients with pseudotumour cerebri.

Afroditi-Despina Lalou, Marek Czosnyka, Zofia H Czosnyka, Deepa Krishnakumar, John D Pickard, Nick J Higgins

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A simplified cranial cavity model to understand the relationship between intracranial pressure and dural sinus pressure.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Headache in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. A CGRP-dependent head pain?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Afroditi-Despina LalouDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK. adl43@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3768-8681
Marek CzosnykaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Zofia H CzosnykaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Deepa KrishnakumarDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
John D PickardDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Nick J HigginsDepartment of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G9439390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePseudotumour cerebri syndrome (PTCS including idiopathic intracranial hypertension) is characterised by the symptoms and signs of raised cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFp) in the absence of ventricular dilatation or an intracranial mass lesion. Its aetiology is unknown in the majority of cases but there is much evidence for impaired CSF absorption. Traditionally, sagittal sinus pressure has been considered to be independent of CSF pressure in adults. However, the discovery of stenoses of intracranial venous sinuses and introduction of venous sinus stenting has highlighted the importance of the venous drainage in PTCS. In this study, we have explored the relationship between CSFp and SSp before and during a CSF infusion test and during CSF drainage. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen patients (9 females:1 male) with PTCS underwent infusion studies in parallel with direct retrograde cerebral venography. Both SSp and CSFp were recorded at a baseline and during CSFp elevation in a course of a CSF infusion test. The drainage of CSF after the CSF infusion was performed in 7 patients. In 5 cases, jugular venous pressure was also measured.

resultsCSFp and SSp including their amplitudes correlated significantly and strongly both at baseline (R = 0.96; p = 0.001) and during infusion (R = 0.92; p = 0.0026). During drainage, this correlation was maintained until SSp reached a stable value, whereas CSFp continued to decrease.

conclusionsIn this series of ten patients with PTCS, CSFp and SSp were coupled, both at baseline and during infusion. The implications of such coupling for the calculation of CSF outflow resistance are discussed.

Indexed as

AdultCerebrospinal Fluid PressureConstriction, PathologicCranial SinusesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhlebographyPseudotumor CerebriStentsYoung AdultCSF outflow resistanceCSF pressureIdiopathic intracranial hypertensionIntracranial pressurePseudotumour cerebriSagittal sinus pressure

Identifiers

PMID31832847
PMCPMC7156361
OpenAlexW2995969075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.