Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832831›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2020

Honeybee survival and flight capacity are compromised by insecticides used for controlling melon pests in Brazil.

Ingrid Naiara Gomes, Kamilla Ingred Castelan Vieira, Lessando Moreira Gontijo, Helder Canto Resende

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Environmental pollution effect on honey bees and their derived products: a comprehensive analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Bees and pesticides: the research impact and scientometrics relations.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingrid Naiara GomesDepartment of Management and Conservation of Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems, Federal University of Viçosa-Campus Florestal, Florestal, MG, 35690-000, Brazil.
Kamilla Ingred Castelan VieiraDepartment of Management and Conservation of Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems, Federal University of Viçosa-Campus Florestal, Florestal, MG, 35690-000, Brazil.
Lessando Moreira GontijoDepartment of Management and Conservation of Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems, Federal University of Viçosa-Campus Florestal, Florestal, MG, 35690-000, Brazil. lessandomg@ufv.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6041-7404
Helder Canto ResendeDepartment of Management and Conservation of Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems, Federal University of Viçosa-Campus Florestal, Florestal, MG, 35690-000, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extensive use of insecticides can cause adverse side effects on pollinators, which negatively impact crop productivity. The pollination carried out by the honeybee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) is crucial in increasing the productivity of the melon (Cucumis melo L.). The main objective of this study was to assess if insecticides applied in the cultivation of cantaloupe melon exhibit significant levels of toxicity toward A. mellifera. We tested the toxicity of azadirachtin, pyriproxyfen, chlorantraniliprole, and imidacloprid, which are commonly sprayed to manage melon pests such as the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), the pickleworm Diaphania nitidalis (Stoll) and the melonworm Diaphania hyalinata (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Three treatments were carried out, 0.0×, 0.1x and 1.0x the concentration recommended by the manufacturer for the control of those pests. Repellency tests, analysis of mortality through contact and ingestion, and flight tests were performed. The insecticide imidacloprid caused mortality rates above 90% in all tested exposure pathways, displaying high residue persistence on plants. Although not causing significant mortality in the ingestion test, pyriproxyfen caused significant mortality after exposure through contact, and change in flight ability. Azadirachtin caused mortality in the ingestion test and impaired the flight ability of bees, while chlorantraniliprole only impaired the flight ability. Moreover, bees were not repelled by these insecticides, suggesting that they may collect contaminated food in the field while foraging. Altogether, ecofriendly, alternative pest control options should be developed, as well as the adoption of more selective insecticides, in order to reduce the non-target effects on honeybees and guarantee their pollination services.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesBrazilCucurbitaceaeFlight, AnimalInsecticidesLepidopteraLimoninsNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPest ControlPollinationPyridinesazadirachtinimidaclopridInsecticidesLimoninsNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPyridinespyriproxyfenIntegrated Pest ManagementMelonwormNeonicotinoidNon-target effectPicklewormPollinatorWhitefly

Identifiers

PMID31832831
OpenAlexW2996282707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.