Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832798›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

Single-port robotic left colectomy: first clinical experience using the SP robot (rSILS).

J H Marks, J F Salem, B K Anderson, J M Josse, H P Schoonyoung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Application of the Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Early Single-Center Experience of DaVinciJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Single-portAnnals of surgical treatment and research · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Robotic single-port surgery: Preliminary experience in general surgery.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Learning curve for single-port robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J H MarksDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA. MarksJ@mlhs.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5977-0603
J F SalemDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
B K AndersonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
J M JosseDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
H P SchoonyoungDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe single-port daVinci robot is a new platform designed to facilitate single-incision surgeries. The objective of this study was to describe the first clinical experience in colorectal surgery using a novel single-port robotic system and report its feasibility and safety.

methodsAfter Institutional Review Board approval was obtained and the study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, we performed single port robot-assisted left colectomy using the novel daVinci SP surgical system on two patients. The surgeries were completed through a single incision. The multichannel port accommodates a three-dimensional articulating camera and three double-jointed articulating instruments. The primary aim of this study was to report, for the first time in the USA, the technical feasibility of the procedure in the living human. The secondary aim was to report the outcomes including blood loss, number of incisions, number of dockings, docking time of the robot, incision length, operative time, console time, need for additional port and instrumentation, intraoperative complications, morbidity and mortality, time for tolerating diet, bowel function, and discharge.

resultsBoth surgeries were completed without conversion through a single incision, 4.0 and 4.5 cm in size. Estimated blood loss was less than 60 ml in both cases. The robot was docked two and three times. Mean time to dock was 13 min (range 3-33 min). There were no intraoperative complications, no morbidity or death. Discharges occurred on postoperative days 2 and 3.

conclusionsSingle-port robotic colectomy using the new robot is feasible and can be safely completed. The overall utility and functionality of the SP robot portends wide utilization and expansion of this technique. Careful development and analysis of the procedure outcomes, training, and cost will be necessary to properly advance the field.

Indexed as

ColectomyLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansOperative TimeLeft colectomyMinimally invasive surgery (MIS)Robotic single-incision laparoscopic surgery (rSILS)Robotic surgerySingle-port colectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.