Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832721›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2020

Poor inhibitory control is associated with greater stimulation and less sedation following alcohol.

Jessica Weafer, K Luan Phan, Harriet de Wit

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Neural correlates of inhibitory control are associated with stimulant-like effects of alcohol.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Moderators of subjective response to alcohol in the human laboratory.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica WeaferDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, MC3077, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. jweafer@uky.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-9900
K Luan PhanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, 1670 Upham Drive, Columbus, OH, USA.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, MC3077, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

Funding

Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
Neurobiological factors underlying sex differences in risk for alcohol abuseK01AA024519 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WEAFER, JESSICA J · 2016 to 2020
$598k
Inhibitory Control and Drug Reward in HumansR21DA037642 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2015 to 2016
$433k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA024519NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivePoor inhibitory control is a well-established risk factor for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Similarly, greater sensitivity to the stimulant effects and less sensitivity to the sedative effects of alcohol are also strongly linked to risk for AUD. Traditionally, these two risk factors have been considered to be orthogonal, and thus they have been studied independently. However, recent evidence from animal and human studies suggests that they may be related. The current study examined the relationship between inhibitory control and subjective responses to alcohol in a sample of healthy young adults.

methodsModerate social drinkers (N = 69) first completed the stop signal task to assess inhibitory control. They then participated in four sessions in which they received an oral dose of ethanol (0.8 g/kg) or placebo in alternating order, providing self-report measures of stimulation and sedation on the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) at regular intervals.

resultsLinear mixed effects models showed that poor inhibitory control was associated with greater stimulation and less sedation following alcohol compared with placebo.

conclusionThese findings provide the first direct evidence that individuals with poor inhibitory control experience greater sensitivity to the rewarding, stimulant effects of alcohol, and less sensitivity to the negative, sedative effects. These findings suggest that inhibition and subjective response to alcohol are not independent risk factors, and that together they constitute a heightened profile of risk for AUD.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismCentral Nervous System StimulantsDouble-Blind MethodEthanolFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleRewardSelf ReportYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsEthanolHypnotics and SedativesAlcoholInhibitory controlRewardSedationStimulation

Identifiers

PMID31832721
PMCPMC7039753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.