ArticleJournal of medical entomology2020
Impact of Unexplored Data Sources on the Historical Distribution of Three Vector Tick Species in Illinois.
Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing survey data across multiple demographic groups in Illinois to assess survey questions and reveal insights about ticks and tick-borne disease risk: a meta-comparison study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Changes in the geographic distribution of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, in the United States.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2023Review
- Current and Future Habitat Suitability Models for Four Ticks of Medical Concern in Illinois, USA.Insects · 2023Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Illinois medical professionals related to ticks and tick-borne disease.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Northward Expansion of Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) into Southwestern Michigan.Journal of medical entomology · 2022Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of veterinary professionals towards ticks and tick-borne diseases in Illinois.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Effects of Climate on the Variation in Abundance of Three Tick Species in Illinois.Journal of medical entomology · 2022Article
- Effects of tick surveillance education on knowledge, attitudes, and practices of local health department employees.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Tick abundance, diversity and pathogen data collected by the National Ecological Observatory Network.GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2022Article
- Tick and Tickborne Pathogen Surveillance as a Public Health Tool in the United States.Journal of medical entomology · 2021Review
- A Survey of Tick Surveillance and Control Practices in the United States.Journal of medical entomology · 2021Article
- Comparing Contributions of Passive and Active Tick Collection Methods to Determine Establishment of Ticks of Public Health Concern Within Illinois.Journal of medical entomology · 2021Article
- Landscape features predict the current and forecast the future geographic spread of Lyme disease.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We updated the Illinois historical (1905-December 2017) distribution and status (not reported, reported or established) maps for Amblyomma americanum (L.) (Acari: Ixodidae), Dermacentor variabilis (Say) (Acari: Ixodidae), and Ixodes scapularis (Say) (Acari: Ixodidae) by compiling publicly available, previously unexplored or newly identified published and unpublished data (untapped data). Primary data sources offered specific tick-level information, followed by secondary and tertiary data sources. For A. americanum, D. variabilis, and I. scapularis, primary data contributed to 90% (4,045/4,482), 80% (2,124/2,640), and 32% (3,490/10,898) tick records vs 10%, 20%, and 68%, respectively from secondary data; primary data updated status in 95% (62/65), 94% (51/54) and in 90% (9/10) of the updated counties for each of these tick species; by 1985 there were tick records in 6%, 68%, and 0% of the counties, compared to 20%, 72%, and 58% by 2004, and 77%, 96%, and 75% of the counties by 2017, respectively for A. americanum, D. variabilis, and I. scapularis. We document the loss of tick records due to unidentified, not cataloged tick collections, unidentified ticks in tick collections, unpublished data or manuscripts without specific county location, and tick-level information, to determine distribution and status. In light of the increase in tick-borne illnesses, updates in historical distributions and status maps help researchers and health officials to identify risk areas for a tick encounter and suggest targeted areas for public outreach and surveillance efforts for ticks and tick-borne diseases. There is a need for a systematic, national vector surveillance program to support research and public health responses to tick expansions and tick-borne diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.