Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832656›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2020

Impact of Unexplored Data Sources on the Historical Distribution of Three Vector Tick Species in Illinois.

Beth Gilliam, Peg Gronemeyer, Sulagna Chakraborty, Fikriyah Winata, Lee Ann Lyons, Catherine Miller-Hunt, Holly C Tuten, Samantha Debosik, Debbie Freeman, Marilyn O'hara-Ruiz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Beth GilliamIllinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
Peg GronemeyerIllinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
Sulagna ChakrabortyCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Fikriyah WinataCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Lee Ann LyonsCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Catherine Miller-HuntDepartment of Biology, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME.
Holly C TutenIllinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
Samantha DebosikIllinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL.
Debbie FreemanIllinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL.
Marilyn O'hara-RuizCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Nohra Mateus-PinillaIllinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We updated the Illinois historical (1905-December 2017) distribution and status (not reported, reported or established) maps for Amblyomma americanum (L.) (Acari: Ixodidae), Dermacentor variabilis (Say) (Acari: Ixodidae), and Ixodes scapularis (Say) (Acari: Ixodidae) by compiling publicly available, previously unexplored or newly identified published and unpublished data (untapped data). Primary data sources offered specific tick-level information, followed by secondary and tertiary data sources. For A. americanum, D. variabilis, and I. scapularis, primary data contributed to 90% (4,045/4,482), 80% (2,124/2,640), and 32% (3,490/10,898) tick records vs 10%, 20%, and 68%, respectively from secondary data; primary data updated status in 95% (62/65), 94% (51/54) and in 90% (9/10) of the updated counties for each of these tick species; by 1985 there were tick records in 6%, 68%, and 0% of the counties, compared to 20%, 72%, and 58% by 2004, and 77%, 96%, and 75% of the counties by 2017, respectively for A. americanum, D. variabilis, and I. scapularis. We document the loss of tick records due to unidentified, not cataloged tick collections, unidentified ticks in tick collections, unpublished data or manuscripts without specific county location, and tick-level information, to determine distribution and status. In light of the increase in tick-borne illnesses, updates in historical distributions and status maps help researchers and health officials to identify risk areas for a tick encounter and suggest targeted areas for public outreach and surveillance efforts for ticks and tick-borne diseases. There is a need for a systematic, national vector surveillance program to support research and public health responses to tick expansions and tick-borne diseases.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionAmblyommaAnimalsArthropod VectorsDermacentorFemaleIllinoisIxodesLarvaMaleNymphSpecies SpecificitydistributionestablishmentIllinoissurveillancetick

Identifiers

PMID31832656
PMCPMC7197698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.