ArticleEClinicalMedicine2019
Risk of a second cancer in Canadians diagnosed with a first cancer in childhood or adolescence.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subsequent primary neoplasm risk among survivors of cancer in adolescence and young adulthood: a population-based study from Alberta, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- Subsequent Primary Neoplasms and Mortality Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer in Alberta, Canada.Cancers · 2026Article
- Risk of Second Primary Neoplasms Among Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based, Cohort Study in Golestan Province, Northern Iran, 2004-2019.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Second malignant neoplasms within 5 years from first primary diagnosis in pediatric oncology patients in Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The Burden of Late Effects and Related Risk Factors in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2021Article
- Sarcoma as Second Cancer in a Childhood Cancer Survivor: Case Report, Large Population Analysis and Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Review
- Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- Shooting for the Moon: Can We Cut Cancer Mortality in Canada By 50% By 2050?Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecond cancers are an adverse outcome experienced by childhood cancer survivors. We quantify the risk and correlates of a second cancer in Canadians diagnosed with a first cancer prior to age 20 years.
methodsUsing death-linked Canadian Cancer Registry data, a population-based cohort diagnosed with a first cancer between 1992 and 2014, prior to age 20 years, were followed for occurrence of a second cancer to the end of 2014. We estimate standardized incidence ratios (SIR), absolute excess risks (AER), cumulative probabilities, and hazard ratios (HR).
findings22,635 people contributed 204,309•1 person-years of follow-up. Overall risk of a second cancer was 6•5 (95% CI: 5•8-7•1) times greater than expected resulting in an AER of 16•5 (14•4-18•5) cancers per 10,000 person-years and a 4•8% (3•8%-6•0%) cumulative probability of a second cancer at 22•6 years of follow-up. SIRs decreased with increasing age at diagnosis and time since diagnosis; were larger in more recent calendar periods of diagnosis; and varied by type of first cancer. Large SIRs in the first year after diagnosis and in those diagnosed in 2010-2014 were partly associated with changing registry practices. For the whole cohort, factors associated with the hazard of a second cancer included: being female vs. male [HR = 1•439 (95%CI: 1•179-1•760)]; being diagnosed in 2005-2014 vs. 1992-2004 [2•084 (1•598-2•719)]; having synchronous first cancers [4•814 (2•042-9•509)]; and being diagnosed with certain types of cancer. Factors varied, however, by type of first cancer.
interpretationRisks of a second cancer are not equally distributed and can be impacted by changes in registry practice and the methods used to define second cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.