Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832621›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2019

A crowdsourced intervention to promote hepatitis B and C testing among men who have sex with men in China: A nationwide online randomized controlled trial.

Thomas Fitzpatrick, Weiming Tang, Katie Mollan, Xin Pan, Po-Lin Chan, Kali Zhou, Yu Cheng, Linghua Li, William Cw Wong, Joseph D Tucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas FitzpatrickDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Weiming TangUNC Project China, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Katie MollanSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Xin PanUNC Project China, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Po-Lin ChanDivision of Communicable Disease, World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office, Manila, Philippines.
Kali ZhouDivision of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Yu ChengSchool of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Linghua LiCenter for Infectious Diseases, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
William Cw WongDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, China.
Joseph D TuckerUNC Project China, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrowdsourcing may be an effective strategy to develop test promotion materials. We conducted an online randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a crowdsourced intervention to promote hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) in China.

methodsMSM never previously tested for hepatitis were recruited through social media. Eligible men were randomized to receive an online crowdsourced intervention or no testing promotion materials. Outcomes including self-reported and confirmed HBV and HCV test uptake were assessed after four weeks. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of men achieving primary and secondary outcomes between the intervention and control arms were calculated.

findings556 eligible men were enrolled. Overall, 17•4% (97/556) of men self-reported HBV and HCV testing and 7•9% (44/556) confirmed HBV and HCV test uptake. The intervention was seen by 72•1% and 29•0% of men in the intervention and control arms, respectively. In intention-to-treat analysis, confirmed HBV and HCV test uptake was similar between the two arms, both when using a missing=failure approach (OR 0•98, 95% CI 0•53-1•82) or multiple imputation (OR 1•46, 95% CI 0•72-2•95).

interpretationThis RCT extends the literature by developing and evaluating an intervention to spur hepatitis testing in a middle-income country with a high burden of hepatitis. Overall test uptake among MSM in China was similar to previous interventions promoting hepatitis testing in high-income countries. We found frequent intervention sharing, complicating interpretation of the results, and the role of crowdsourcing to promote hepatitis testing remains unclear.

Identifiers

PMID31832621
PMCPMC6890946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.