Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832587›Full record

ArticleBJS open2019

Effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative in reducing time to surgery for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy.

J R Bamber, T J Stephens, D A Cromwell, E Duncan, G P Martin, N F Quiney, J F Abercrombie, I J Beckingham, Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Hospital Level of Care on the Management of Acute Cholecystitis: a Population-Based Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating quality in clinical care.Surgery (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J R BamberPracticality Consulting Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8763-6495
T J StephensWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.
D A CromwellDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK.
E DuncanDepartment of Professional Standards Royal College of Surgeons of England London UK.
G P MartinThe Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
N F QuineyDepartment of Anaesthesia Royal Surrey County Hospital Guildford UK.
J F AbercrombieDepartments of Colorectal Surgery Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham UK.
I J BeckinghamHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham UK.
Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute gallstone disease is a high-volume emergency general surgery presentation with wide variations in the quality of care provided across the UK. This controlled cohort evaluation assessed whether participation in a quality improvement collaborative approach reduced time to surgery for patients with acute gallstone disease to fewer than 8 days from presentation, in line with national guidance. Methods: Patients admitted to hospital with acute biliary conditions in England and Wales between 1 April 2014 and 31 December 2017 were identified from Hospital Episode Statistics data. Time series of quarterly activity were produced for the Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative (Chole-QuIC) and all other acute National Health Service hospitals (control group). A negative binomial regression model was used to compare the proportion of patients having surgery within 8 days in the baseline and intervention periods. Results: Of 13 sites invited to join Chole-QuIC, 12 participated throughout the collaborative, which ran from October 2016 to January 2018. Of 7944 admissions, 1160 patients had a cholecystectomy within 8 days of admission, a significant improvement ( Conclusion: A surgeon-led quality improvement collaborative approach improved care for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAcute DiseaseCholecystectomyEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandGallstonesHealth Plan ImplementationHumansIntersectoral CollaborationPatient AdmissionProgram EvaluationState MedicineTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentWales

Identifiers

PMID31832587
PMCPMC6887703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.