Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832586›Full record

ArticleBJS open2019

Outcome after liver resection for primary and recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

A Nickkholgh, O Ghamarnejad, E Khajeh, P Tinoush, T Bruckner, Y Kulu, M Mieth, B Goeppert, S Roessler, K H Weiss and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Renal metastasis from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.International cancer conference journal · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A NickkholghDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
O GhamarnejadDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
E KhajehDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
P TinoushDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
T BrucknerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
Y KuluDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
M MiethDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
B GoeppertInstitute of Pathology Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
S RoesslerInstitute of Pathology Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
K H WeissDepartment of Internal Medicine Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
K HoffmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0872-9264
M W BüchlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.
A MehrabiDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6163-1525
German Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEZimmer Biomet (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Liver resection is the only curative therapeutic option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but the approach to recurrent ICC is controversial. This study analysed the outcome of liver resection in patients with recurrent ICC. Methods: Demographic, radiological, clinical, operative, surgical pathological and follow-up data for all patients with a final surgical pathological diagnosis of ICC treated in a tertiary referral centre between 2001 and 2015 were collected retrospectively and analysed. Results: A total of 190 patients had liver resection for primary ICC. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 74·8, 56·6 and 37·9 per cent respectively. Independent determinants of OS were age 65 years or above (hazard ratio (HR) 2·18, 95 per cent c.i. 1·18 to 4·0; Conclusion: Patients with recurrent ICC may benefit from repeat surgical resection.

Indexed as

HepatectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCholangiocarcinomaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProportional Hazards ModelsReoperationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31832586
PMCPMC6887914
OpenAlexW2973131826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.