Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832566›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2019

Windows Into Human Health Through Wearables Data Analytics.

Daniel Witt, Ryan Kellogg, Michael Snyder, Jessilyn Dunn

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06615349 (DigiPall; a Randomized Controlled Trial of Digital Patient Reported Outcome and Biomarker Monitoring in Palliative Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06615349 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

DigiPall; a Randomized Controlled Trial of Digital Patient Reported Outcome and Biomarker Monitoring in Palliative Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorDavid BlumRan2025 to 2027Enrolled382ConditionsTerminal Illness, Terminal CancerArmsDigiPall
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Research data use in a digital society: a deliberative public engagement.International journal of population data science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel WittMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ryan KelloggDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Michael SnyderDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Jessilyn DunnDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

Longitudinal Multiomics Microbial Profiling in Healthy and Disease IndividualsU54DK102556 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, MICHAEL P., WEINSTOCK, GEORGE M · 2014 to 2015
$7.7M
Longitudinal Multi-Omic Profiles to Reveal Mechanisms of Obesity-Mediated Insulin ResistanceR01DK110186 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MCLAUGHLIN, TRACEY, SNYDER, MICHAEL P. · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110186NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK102556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable sensors (wearables) have been commonly integrated into a wide variety of commercial products and are increasingly being used to collect and process raw physiological parameters into salient digital health information. The data collected by wearables are currently being investigated across a broad set of clinical domains and patient populations. There is significant research occurring in the domain of algorithm development, with the aim of translating raw sensor data into fitness- or health-related outcomes of interest for users, patients, and health care providers.

objectivesThe aim of this review is to highlight a selected group of fitness- and health-related indicators from wearables data and to describe several algorithmic approaches used to generate these higher order indicators.

methodsA systematic search of the Pubmed database was performed with the following search terms (number of records in parentheses): Fitbit algorithm (18), Apple Watch algorithm (3), Garmin algorithm (5), Microsoft Band algorithm (8), Samsung Gear algorithm (2), Xiaomi MiBand algorithm (1), Huawei Band (Watch) algorithm (2), photoplethysmography algorithm (465), accelerometry algorithm (966), ECG algorithm (8287), continuous glucose monitor algorithm (343). The search terms chosen for this review are focused on algorithms for wearable devices that dominated the commercial wearables market between 2014-2017 and that were highly represented in the biomedical literature. A second set of search terms included categories of algorithms for fitness-related and health-related indicators that are commonly used in wearable devices (e.g. accelerometry, PPG, ECG). These papers covered the following domain areas: fitness; exercise; movement; physical activity; step count; walking; running; swimming; energy expenditure; atrial fibrillation; arrhythmia; cardiovascular; autonomic nervous system; neuropathy; heart rate variability; fall detection; trauma; behavior change; diet; eating; stress detection; serum glucose monitoring; continuous glucose monitoring; diabetes mellitus type 1; diabetes mellitus type 2. All studies uncovered through this search on commercially available device algorithms and pivotal studies on sensor algorithm development were summarized, and a summary table was constructed using references generated by the literature review as described (Table 1).

conclusionsWearable health technologies aim to collect and process raw physiological or environmental parameters into salient digital health information. Much of the current and future utility of wearables lies in the signal processing steps and algorithms used to analyze large volumes of data. Continued algorithmic development and advances in machine learning techniques will further increase analytic capabilities. In the context of these advances, our review aims to highlight a range of advances in fitness- and other health-related indicators provided by current wearable technologies.

Indexed as

algorithmsdigital healthphysiologic monitoringwearables

Identifiers

PMID31832566
PMCPMC6907085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.