Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832536›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2019

Pilot study: Improving attention bias modification of alcohol cues through concealed gaze-contingent feedback in alcohol dependence.

Timo L Kvamme, Mads U Pedersen, Morten Overgaard, Kristine Rømer Thomsen, Valerie Voon

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07103785 (The Effectiveness of a Mobile Game Intervention in Modifying Attentional Bias Toward Alcohol Cues), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07103785 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of a Mobile Game Intervention in Modifying Attentional Bias Toward Alcohol Cues: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of YalovaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsAlcohol Use DisorderArmsMobile game app, Akamprosat or Naltrekson or combined medical treatment (Akamprosat and Naltrekson)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timo L KvammeCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mads U PedersenCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten OvergaardCognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, CFIN/MindLab, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kristine Rømer ThomsenCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Valerie VoonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P008747/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an attempt to improve attention bias modification (ABM), we tested whether an attentional training protocol which featured monetary operant conditioning of eye-gaze to avoid alcohol stimuli in alcohol-dependent patients could reduce attention, craving and relapse to alcohol. We employed a pilot randomized control trial (RCT) with 21 detoxified alcohol dependent patients (48.9 ± 10 years of age, 9 male) from an inpatient and outpatient treatment centre. The novel concealed operant conditioning paradigm provided monetary reinforcements or punishments respective to eye-gaze patterns towards neutral or towards alcohol stimuli along with an 80% probability of a to-be-detected probe appearing following neutral stimuli (ET-ABM group). Patients in the control-group received random monetary feedback and a 50/50 ABM contingency. We compared AB on trained and untrained stimuli and addiction severity measures of obsessive thoughts and desires to alcohol following training. We further assessed addiction severity and relapse outcome at a 3-month follow-up. Results indicate that this attentional retraining only worked for the trained stimuli and did not generalize to untrained stimuli or to addiction severity measures or relapse outcome. Potential explanations for lack of generalization include the low sample size and imbalances on important prognostic variables between the active-group and control-group. We discuss progress and challenges for further research on cognitive training using gaze-contingent feedback.

Indexed as

AlcoholAttentional bias modificationCravingEye-trackingGaze-contingent feedback

Identifiers

PMID31832536
PMCPMC6889756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.